Doody M M, Hayes H M, Bilgrad R
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7362, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Jan;11(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00177-0.
To determine whether causes of death obtained through National Death Index (NDI) Plus are comparable to those obtained by requesting death certificates from state vital statistics offices and having deaths coded by contractor nosologists.
The authors compared underlying cause of death codes obtained from NDI Plus with those assigned by contractor nosologists for a sample of 250 known decedents.
The underlying cause of death codes differed for 18 (7%) of 249 successful matches. Independent coding by an expert National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) nosologist trainer revealed that seven of these had an NDI Plus code that matched the code provided by the NCHS nosologist and a contractor nosologist code that did not match the NCHS nosologist code, seven had a contractor nosologist code that matched the NCHS nosologist code and an NDI Plus code that did not match the NCHS nosologist code, and four had both an NDI Plus and a contractor nosologist code that did not match the NCHS nosologist code. The level of disagreement with the NCHS nosologist and the organ systems involved were similar for NDI Plus and the contractor nosologist.
The authors report that NDI Plus provides comparable information within a substantially shorter time period for most states and, for known decedents, at about half the cost of standard procedures.
确定通过国家死亡指数(NDI)升级版获得的死亡原因与通过向各州生命统计办公室索取死亡证明并由承包商疾病分类学家进行死因编码所获得的死亡原因是否可比。
作者将从NDI升级版获得的根本死因编码与承包商疾病分类学家为250名已知死者样本所指定的编码进行了比较。
在249次成功匹配中,有18例(7%)的根本死因编码不同。由美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)疾病分类学家专家培训师进行的独立编码显示,其中7例的NDI升级版编码与NCHS疾病分类学家提供的编码匹配,而承包商疾病分类学家的编码与NCHS疾病分类学家的编码不匹配;7例的承包商疾病分类学家编码与NCHS疾病分类学家的编码匹配,而NDI升级版编码与NCHS疾病分类学家的编码不匹配;4例的NDI升级版编码和承包商疾病分类学家的编码均与NCHS疾病分类学家的编码不匹配。NDI升级版和承包商疾病分类学家与NCHS疾病分类学家的不一致程度以及所涉及的器官系统相似。
作者报告称,对于大多数州而言,NDI升级版能在更短的时间内提供可比信息,对于已知死者,其成本约为标准程序的一半。