• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Therapeutic communities. Enhancing retention in treatment using "Senior Professor" staff.

作者信息

De Leon G, Hawke J, Jainchill N, Melnick G

机构信息

Center for Therapeutic Community Research (CTCR) at National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI), 16th Floor, 2 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10048, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Dec;19(4):375-82. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00124-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00124-0
PMID:11166502
Abstract

Evaluation research documents a firm relationship between retention and treatment outcomes among substance abusers in therapeutic communities (TCs). However, most admissions leave treatment prematurely, particularly in the first months after admission. This paper reports findings from a controlled study that assessed the efficacy of an intervention to reduce early dropout in a residential TC. In the "Senior Professor" (SP) intervention, the most experienced clinical and managerial staff in a TC program were utilized to conduct program induction seminars during the first weeks of admissions, traditionally the period of the highest rate of dropout. Rates of short-term retention (30 days of treatment) were compared for the experimental cohort (N=362), who received the intervention, and a cohort of admissions (N=243), who received standard or non-enhanced treatment. Findings showed that the SP intervention significantly reduced the likelihood of early dropout compared with controls. The enhanced effects are most evident for the new inductees with the lowest levels of motivation. Some theoretical and clinical implications are discussed as to the utilization of experienced staff to increase retention among new inductees with relatively lower motivational levels, who are at greatest risk for early dropout.

摘要

相似文献

1
Therapeutic communities. Enhancing retention in treatment using "Senior Professor" staff.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Dec;19(4):375-82. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00124-0.
2
Therapeutic communities: what are the retention rates?治疗性社区:留存率是多少?
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1984;10(2):267-84. doi: 10.3109/00952998409002785.
3
Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among adolescents and adult substance abusers.青少年和成年药物滥用者对治疗性社区治疗的动机和准备情况。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1997 Nov;23(4):485-506. doi: 10.3109/00952999709016891.
4
The impact of a social network intervention on retention in Belgian therapeutic communities: a quasi-experimental study.社交网络干预对比利时治疗社区留存率的影响:一项准实验研究。
Addiction. 2006 Jul;101(7):1027-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01441.x.
5
Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment.环境、动机、准备情况和适宜性(CMRS量表):预测在治疗性社区治疗中的留存率
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994 Nov;20(4):495-515. doi: 10.3109/00952999409109186.
6
Effectiveness of therapeutic communities: a systematic review.治疗社区的疗效:系统评价。
Eur Addict Res. 2012;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000331007. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
7
Reasons for dropout from drug abuse treatment: symptoms, personality, and motivation.药物滥用治疗脱失的原因:症状、个性与动机。
Addict Behav. 2006 Feb;31(2):320-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.013. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
8
Therapeutic communities for substance related disorder.针对物质相关障碍的治疗社区。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD005338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005338.pub2.
9
Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among cocaine and other drug abusers.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1997 May;23(2):169-89. doi: 10.3109/00952999709040940.
10
A client-treatment matching protocol for therapeutic communities: first report.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Oct;21(3):119-28. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00191-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Opioid use disorder.阿片类药物使用障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Jan 9;6(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0137-5.
2
Perceived coercion to enter treatment among involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients with substance use disorders.在非自愿和自愿入院的物质使用障碍患者中,对接受治疗的感知性强制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1906-4.
3
An Exploration of Responses to Drug Conditioned Stimuli during Treatment for Substance Dependence.物质依赖治疗期间对药物条件刺激反应的探索
J Addict. 2013;2013:394064. doi: 10.1155/2013/394064. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
4
Fixed and dynamic predictors of treatment process in therapeutic communities for substance abusers in Belgium.比利时物质滥用治疗社区中治疗过程的固定和动态预测因素。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Oct 11;7:43. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-43.
5
Understanding recovery barriers: youth perceptions about substance use relapse.了解康复障碍:青少年对物质使用复发的看法。
Am J Health Behav. 2012 Sep;36(5):602-14. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.36.5.3.
6
The effect of using assessment instruments on substance-abuse outpatients' adherence to treatment: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.使用评估工具对物质滥用门诊患者治疗依从性的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 25;11:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-123.
7
Contrasting social climates of small peer-run versus a larger staff-run substance abuse recovery setting.小同行运营与更大规模员工运营的物质滥用康复环境的对比社会氛围。
Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Dec;48(3-4):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9432-3.
8
Modified therapeutic community for co-occurring disorders: single investigator meta analysis.共病的改良治疗社区:单一研究者荟萃分析。
Subst Abus. 2010 Jul;31(3):146-61. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2010.495662.
9
Linguistic analysis to assess the effect of a mindfulness intervention on self-change for adults in substance use recovery.语言分析评估正念干预对物质使用康复成人自我改变的影响。
Subst Abus. 2010 Apr;31(2):79-85. doi: 10.1080/08897071003641271.
10
Understanding treatment readiness in recently assessed, pre-treatment substance abusers.了解近期评估的治疗前药物滥用者的治疗准备情况。
Subst Abus. 2007 Mar;28(1):11-23. doi: 10.1300/J465v28n01_03.