De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, Jainchill N
Center for Therapeutic Community Research (CTCR), National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI), New York 10013.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994 Nov;20(4):495-515. doi: 10.3109/00952999409109186.
Based upon clinical considerations, scales were developed measuring client perceptions across four interrelated domains: circumstances (external pressures), motivation (intrinsic pressures), readiness, and suitability (CMRS) for residential TC treatment. This paper, the first in a series, reports findings on the reliability of the CMRS and its validity as a predictor of retention in TC treatment in three cohorts of consecutive admissions to a long-term residential TC. The main findings show that: (a) discriminant and factor analyses confirm the face validity of the original four rationale scales; (b) scores distribute into four groups, with most clients in the moderately low to moderately high range; (c) two cross-validation studies confirm the internal consistency of the scales, and a linear relationship between the separate and total CMRS scores and short-term retention in all three cohorts and long-term retention in two cohorts. The present psychometric study provides impressive findings on the reliability and validity of the CMRS scales as predictors of retention in long-term TCs. Although still considered experimental, awaiting replicational studies and firm conclusions concerning generalizability, the CMRS holds considerable promise for research, theory, and practice.
基于临床考量,开发了一些量表来衡量服务对象在四个相互关联的领域的认知:情况(外部压力)、动机(内在压力)、准备度和适合度(CMRS),用于住院治疗社区(TC)治疗。本文是系列文章中的第一篇,报告了CMRS的信度及其作为长期住院TC连续三个队列中TC治疗留存率预测指标的效度研究结果。主要研究结果表明:(a)判别分析和因子分析证实了原始四个理论量表的表面效度;(b)分数分为四组,大多数服务对象处于中度低到中度高的范围;(c)两项交叉验证研究证实了量表的内部一致性,以及单独和总的CMRS分数与所有三个队列中的短期留存率以及两个队列中的长期留存率之间的线性关系。目前的心理测量学研究为CMRS量表作为长期TC留存率预测指标的信度和效度提供了令人印象深刻的研究结果。尽管CMRS仍被视为实验性的,有待复制研究以及关于普遍性的确定结论,但它在研究、理论和实践方面具有很大的前景。