Lillie R D, Jirge S K
Histochemistry. 1975;41(3):249-56. doi: 10.1007/BF00497688.
With the demonstration that cationic dye staining of acid mucins can be prevented by treatment with hydrocholoric acid or thionyl chloride in nonpolar, nonalcoholic solvents it has been contended that the blockade has occurred by lactonization of the acid mucosaccharides. It is further contended that also in methanolic HCl lactonization is the only process by which cationic dye staining of acid mucins occurs to the exclusion of methyl esterification of the carboxyls. We have demonstrated that an acetylation adequate to prevent the PAS reaction of mucins does not prevent either direct cationic dye staining or its blockade by methylation, and that periodic acid cleavage of the 2,3 glycol of hyaluronic acid mucins does not prevent methylation blockade of cationic dye staining. With occupying or destroying the variation of(3) hydroxyl on which variation of-lactonization would have to occur it is believed that the successful blockade must have occurred by methyl esterification of the carboxyl. Lactonization must be regarded as an alternative rather than an exclusive pathway for this blockade.
通过证明在非极性、无醇溶剂中用盐酸或亚硫酰氯处理可防止酸性粘蛋白的阳离子染料染色,有人认为这种阻断是通过酸性粘多糖的内酯化发生的。进一步有人认为,在甲醇盐酸中,内酯化也是酸性粘蛋白阳离子染料染色发生而羧基甲基酯化被排除的唯一过程。我们已经证明,足以防止粘蛋白PAS反应的乙酰化并不能防止直接阳离子染料染色或其甲基化阻断,并且透明质酸粘蛋白的2,3二醇的高碘酸裂解也不能防止阳离子染料染色的甲基化阻断。由于占据或破坏了内酯化必须发生变化的(3)羟基的变化,人们认为成功的阻断一定是通过羧基的甲基酯化发生的。内酯化必须被视为这种阻断的一种替代途径,而不是唯一途径。