Yucha C B, Clark L, Smith M, Uris P, LaFleur B, Duval S
University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Appl Nurs Res. 2001 Feb;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1053/apnr.2001.21078.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of biofeedback in the treatment of stages 1 and 2 essential hypertension via meta-analytical methods. A utilization-focused integrative review was limited to adult randomized clinical trials, and study groups were categorized into biofeedback, active control, and inactive control. Both biofeedback and active control treatments resulted in a reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Only biofeedback (with related cognitive therapy and relaxation training) showed a significantly greater reduction in both SBP (6.7 mm Hg) and DBP (4.8 mm Hg) when compared with inactive control treatments. Nurses in practice settings should consider biofeedback therapy for their hypertensive clients.
本研究的目的是通过荟萃分析方法确定生物反馈在治疗1期和2期原发性高血压中的有效性。一项以利用为重点的综合评价仅限于成人随机临床试验,研究组分为生物反馈组、积极对照组和非积极对照组。生物反馈治疗和积极对照治疗均导致收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)降低。与非积极对照治疗相比,只有生物反馈(结合相关认知疗法和放松训练)在SBP(6.7毫米汞柱)和DBP(4.8毫米汞柱)方面均显示出显著更大幅度的降低。实际工作中的护士应为其高血压患者考虑生物反馈疗法。