Blanchard E B, Miller S T, Abel G G, Haynes M R, Wicker R
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Spring;12(1):99-109. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-99.
Direct biofeedback of blood pressure was compared with frontal EMG biofeedback and with self-instructed relaxation for the treatment of essential hypertension in a controlled group outcome study. Patients were followed up for four months after the end of treatment. Generalization of treatment effects was assessed through pre- and posttreatment measurements of blood pressure under clinical conditions in a physician's office. There were no significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) of the patients receiving blood pressure biofeedback decreased 8.1 mm mercury (p = 0.07) and the SBP of the patients in the relaxation condition decreased 9.5 mm mercury (p = 0.05). In the generalization measures, there were significant reductions in SBP for the relaxation group. The results are discussed in terms of the general lack of replicability within the area of biofeedback treatment of hypertension.
在一项对照分组结果研究中,对血压直接生物反馈、额肌电图生物反馈和自我指导放松治疗原发性高血压进行了比较。治疗结束后对患者进行了四个月的随访。通过在医生办公室临床条件下治疗前后的血压测量来评估治疗效果的普遍性。舒张压没有显著降低。接受血压生物反馈的患者收缩压(SBP)下降了8.1毫米汞柱(p = 0.07),处于放松状态的患者收缩压下降了9.5毫米汞柱(p = 0.05)。在普遍性测量中,放松组的收缩压有显著降低。根据高血压生物反馈治疗领域普遍缺乏可重复性对结果进行了讨论。