Suppr超能文献

因心力衰竭到急诊科就诊时的呼吸困难持续时间、痛苦程度及强度。

Dyspnea duration, distress, and intensity in emergency department visits for heart failure.

作者信息

Parshall M B, Welsh J D, Brockopp D Y, Heiser R M, Schooler M P, Cassidy K B

机构信息

University of New Mexico College of Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5688, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2001 Jan-Feb;30(1):47-56. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2001.112492.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is the most common symptom among patients with heart failure (HF) who present to the emergency department (ED), but it is not clear which dimensions of the symptom prompt ED visits, or whether dyspnea characteristics are related to visit disposition.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to explore the influence of dyspnea duration, distress, and intensity on decisions of patients with HF to come to an ED and the disposition of visits.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients treated for HF in an urban university hospital ED (N = 57) who were interviewed retrospectively. Open-ended questions pertained to symptoms in general and dyspnea at the time of the visit. Subjects rated recalled dyspnea distress (0 = not at all bothered by breathing; 4 = bothered very much by breathing) for when they decided to come to the ED (Decision) and a week before the visit (Week Before), as well as duration--the number of days before the visit that dyspnea was recalled as having been as severe as at Decision. After the interviews, a subsample (n = 34) rated the intensity of a set of dyspnea sensory quality descriptors for Decision and Week Before (0 = not endorsed; 1 = very mild; 10 = very severe). Charts were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy percent recalled dyspnea as the most distressing symptom at Decision, or the primary reason for the visit; 88% were admitted. Dyspnea duration was unrelated to admission. Duration was 3 days or less for 65% of the sample, but 6 days or more for 35%. There was no duration-related difference in dyspnea distress or intensity at Decision, but subjects with a duration < or =3 days reported lower levels of both dimensions for Week Before with significant increases from Week Before to Decision. Those with longer episodes reported high levels of distress and intensity in both time frames with no significant change in either dimension.

CONCLUSION

Subjects reported high levels of distress and intensity at Decision, regardless of dyspnea duration. Differences in recalled duration were associated with 2 distinct patterns in distress and intensity ratings but were not associated with admission. Dyspnea duration does not appear to be a valid criterion for judging condition severity in HF-related visits to the ED.

摘要

背景

呼吸困难是前往急诊科(ED)就诊的心力衰竭(HF)患者最常见的症状,但尚不清楚该症状的哪些方面促使患者前来急诊科就诊,以及呼吸困难特征是否与就诊结局相关。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨呼吸困难持续时间、痛苦程度和强度对HF患者前往急诊科就诊决策及就诊结局的影响。

方法

研究人群包括在一家城市大学医院急诊科接受HF治疗的患者(N = 57),对他们进行回顾性访谈。开放式问题涉及一般症状以及就诊时的呼吸困难情况。受试者对决定前来急诊科就诊时(决定时)和就诊前一周(前一周)回忆起的呼吸困难痛苦程度进行评分(0 = 完全未受呼吸困扰;4 = 深受呼吸困扰),以及对持续时间进行评分——回忆起的呼吸困难与决定前来就诊时严重程度相同的天数。访谈后,一个子样本(n = 34)对决定时和前一周一组呼吸困难感觉质量描述词的强度进行评分(0 = 未认可;1 = 非常轻微;10 = 非常严重)。同时对病历进行回顾。

结果

70%的患者回忆起在决定前来就诊时呼吸困难是最令人痛苦的症状,或是就诊的主要原因;88%的患者被收治入院。呼吸困难持续时间与收治入院无关。65%的样本持续时间为3天或更短,但35%的样本持续时间为6天或更长。决定前来就诊时,呼吸困难痛苦程度或强度与持续时间无关,但持续时间≤3天的受试者在前一周这两个维度的评分较低,从前往前一周有显著增加。发作时间较长的患者在两个时间段的痛苦程度和强度评分都较高,且两个维度均无显著变化。

结论

无论呼吸困难持续时间如何,受试者在决定前来就诊时都报告有较高的痛苦程度和强度。回忆起的持续时间差异与痛苦程度和强度评分的两种不同模式相关,但与收治入院无关。呼吸困难持续时间似乎不是判断与HF相关的急诊科就诊病情严重程度的有效标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验