Suppr超能文献

皮下注射依诺肝素每日一次或两次与静脉注射普通肝素治疗静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的比较。

Subcutaneous enoxaparin once or twice daily compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolic disease.

作者信息

Merli G, Spiro T E, Olsson C G, Abildgaard U, Davidson B L, Eldor A, Elias D, Grigg A, Musset D, Rodgers G M, Trowbridge A A, Yusen R D, Zawilska K

机构信息

Division of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 3rd Floor, 211 South Ninth Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2001 Feb 6;134(3):191-202. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-3-200102060-00009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparins administered subcutaneously once or twice daily have been reported to be as safe and efficacious as intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolic disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether subcutaneous enoxaparin administered once or twice daily is as effective as continuously infused unfractionated heparin in acute symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, partially blinded equivalence trial.

SETTING

74 hospitals in 16 countries.

PATIENTS

900 patients with symptomatic lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis, including 287 (32%) with confirmed pulmonary embolism.

INTERVENTIONS

Initial therapy with dose-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin at fixed dosages of 1.0 mg/kg of body weight twice daily or 1.5 mg/kg once daily. Long-term oral anticoagulation was started in all patients within 72 hours of randomization.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical end points assessed during a 3-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Equivalent efficacy was seen in the heparin group and both enoxaparin groups. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism recurred in 12 of 290 patients receiving unfractionated heparin (4.1%), 13 of 298 patients receiving once-daily enoxaparin (4.4%), and 9 of 312 patients receiving twice-daily enoxaparin (2.9%). Compared with unfractionated heparin, the treatment difference was 0.2% (95% CI, -3.04% to 3.49%) for once-daily enoxaparin and -1.2% (CI, -4.2% to 1.7%) for twice-daily enoxaparin. Incidence of major hemorrhage did not differ among the three treatment groups. Major hemorrhage occurred in 6 of 290 patients (2.1%) in the unfractionated heparin group, 5 of 298 patients (1.7%) in the once-daily enoxaparin group, and 4 of 312 patients (1.3%) in the twice-daily enoxaparin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous enoxaparin once or twice daily is as effective and safe as dose-adjusted, continuously infused unfractionated heparin in the prevention of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease.

摘要

背景

据报道,每日皮下注射一次或两次的低分子量肝素在治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞性疾病方面与静脉注射普通肝素一样安全有效。

目的

确定每日皮下注射一次或两次依诺肝素在急性有症状静脉血栓栓塞性疾病中是否与持续静脉输注普通肝素一样有效。

设计

随机、对照、部分盲法等效性试验。

地点

16个国家的74家医院。

患者

900例有症状的下肢深静脉血栓形成患者,其中287例(32%)确诊为肺栓塞。

干预措施

初始治疗采用剂量调整的静脉注射普通肝素,与皮下注射依诺肝素固定剂量(每日两次,1.0mg/kg体重;或每日一次,1.5mg/kg体重)进行比较。所有患者在随机分组后72小时内开始长期口服抗凝治疗。

测量指标

在3个月随访期内评估临床终点。

结果

肝素组和两个依诺肝素组疗效相当。接受普通肝素治疗的290例患者中有12例(4.1%)出现有症状的静脉血栓栓塞复发,接受每日一次依诺肝素治疗的298例患者中有13例(4.4%)复发,接受每日两次依诺肝素治疗的312例患者中有9例(2.9%)复发。与普通肝素相比,每日一次依诺肝素的治疗差异为0.2%(95%CI,-3.04%至3.49%),每日两次依诺肝素的治疗差异为-1.2%(CI,-4.2%至1.7%)。三个治疗组的大出血发生率无差异。普通肝素组290例患者中有6例(2.1%)发生大出血,每日一次依诺肝素组298例患者中有5例(1.7%)发生大出血,每日两次依诺肝素组312例患者中有4例(1.3%)发生大出血。

结论

每日皮下注射一次或两次依诺肝素在预防有症状的静脉血栓栓塞性疾病复发方面与剂量调整的持续静脉输注普通肝素一样有效和安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验