Tittel A, Treutner K H, Titkova S, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V
Department of Surgery, Technical University, Aachen, Germany.
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jan;15(1):44-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640000256.
This study aimed to compare new adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis. In a first operation, 24 rabbits underwent fixation of deserosated cecum (6 cm2) to the lateral abdominal wall to induce standardized adhesions. After 4 weeks, adhesiolysis was performed by laparoscopy (n = 12) or laparotomy (n = 12). Outcome was assessed by the incidence, extent, and location of adhesion reformation. After conventional adhesiolysis, new adhesions developed in all the rabbits, as compared with 75% after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The extent of newly formed adhesions was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) after laparoscopic adhesiolysis (368+/-115 mm2) as compared with conventional adhesiolysis (2434+/-245 mm2). There were no adhesions to trocar wounds, but adhesions to the abdominal incision were found in 33% of the conventional group. In a rabbit model comparing laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in a standardized experimental setting, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with a significantly reduced formation of new postoperative adhesions.
本研究旨在比较腹腔镜粘连松解术和传统粘连松解术后新粘连的形成情况。在首次手术中,24只兔子接受了将去腹膜的盲肠(6平方厘米)固定于腹壁外侧的操作,以诱导形成标准化粘连。4周后,通过腹腔镜手术(n = 12)或开腹手术(n = 12)进行粘连松解。通过粘连再形成的发生率、范围和位置来评估结果。与腹腔镜粘连松解术后75%的兔子出现新粘连相比,传统粘连松解术后所有兔子均形成了新粘连。与传统粘连松解术(2434±245平方毫米)相比,腹腔镜粘连松解术后新形成粘连的范围显著减小(p < 0.001)(368±115平方毫米)。套管针伤口未出现粘连,但传统组中有33%的兔子腹部切口出现粘连。在标准化实验环境下比较腹腔镜粘连松解术和传统粘连松解术的兔子模型中,腹腔镜粘连松解术与术后新粘连形成的显著减少相关。