Matthews Brent D, Pratt Broc L, Backus Charles L, Kercher Kent W, Heniford B Todd
Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, USA.
Am Surg. 2002 Nov;68(11):936-40; discussion 941.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of early adhesiolysis on long-term adhesion formation after the intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene (PP) mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh in a rabbit model. Through a small midline laparotomy a 2 x 2-cm piece of mesh (n = 80) was sewn to an intact peritoneum on each side of a midline incision in 40 New Zealand White rabbits. Two types of ePTFE mesh [Dual Mesh (Dual) and modified Dual Mesh (C-Type), W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ] and PP mesh (Marlex, C.R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were compared. In 10 rabbits (n = 20) a laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LapA) was performed at one week. Mesh adhesions were scored using a modified Diamond scale (0, 0%; 1, 1-25%; 2, 26-50%; and 3, > 50%) at 1, 3, 9, and 16 weeks by serial microlaparoscopic (2 mm) examinations. After recording the final adhesion score at 16 weeks the prosthetic biomaterials were excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for histologic evaluation of mesothelial layer growth (%) on the visceral surface of the mesh. Statistical differences (P value < 0.05) were measured by chi-square and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. There were no statistical differences in mean adhesion scores at adhesiolysis at 7 days. The mean adhesion scores in the groups undergoing laparoscopic adhesiolysis was statistically less (P < 0.05) for PP and both ePTFE meshes at 3-, 9-, and 16-week intervals compared with those not undergoing adhesiolysis. The percentage of mesothelialization on the visceral surface of the mesh was not statistically different between the adhesiolysis and control groups for any of the prosthetic biomaterials. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis at one week minimizes subsequent adhesion formation to PP and ePTFE mesh over a 4-month follow-up. Adhesion formation within the first 7 days after mesh implantation appears to determine the long-term adhesion score. Eliminating adhesions to mesh by mechanical or other means during this critical time may control adhesions to the mesh and subsequent mesh-related complications.
本研究的目的是在兔模型中研究早期粘连松解对聚丙烯(PP)网片和膨体聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)网片腹腔内植入后长期粘连形成的影响。通过小的正中剖腹术,将一块2×2厘米的网片(n = 80)缝到40只新西兰白兔正中切口两侧完整的腹膜上。比较了两种类型的ePTFE网片[双网片(Dual)和改良双网片(C型),W.L. Gore and Associates,弗拉格斯塔夫,亚利桑那州]和PP网片(Marlex,C.R. Bard,默里山,新泽西州)。在10只兔子(n = 20)中,在1周时进行腹腔镜粘连松解术(LapA)。通过连续微腹腔镜(2毫米)检查,在第1、3、9和16周使用改良的戴蒙德量表(0,0%;1,1 - 25%;2,26 - 50%;3,> 50%)对网片粘连进行评分。在记录16周时的最终粘连评分后,将假体生物材料与前腹壁整块切除,以对网片脏面的间皮层生长(%)进行组织学评估。通过卡方检验和威尔科克森符号秩检验测量统计学差异(P值<0.05)。在粘连松解术后7天时,平均粘连评分无统计学差异。与未进行粘连松解的组相比,在3周、9周和16周时,接受腹腔镜粘连松解的PP组和两种ePTFE网片组的平均粘连评分在统计学上更低(P < 0.05)。对于任何一种假体生物材料,粘连松解组和对照组在网片脏面的间皮化百分比在统计学上没有差异。在4个月的随访中,1周时的腹腔镜粘连松解可使随后对PP和ePTFE网片的粘连形成最小化。网片植入后前7天内的粘连形成似乎决定了长期粘连评分。在这个关键时期通过机械或其他手段消除对网片的粘连可能控制对网片的粘连及随后与网片相关的并发症。