van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, van der Burg H, Christiansen T, De Graeve D, Duchesne I, Gerdtham U G, Gerfin M, Geurts J, Gross L, Häkkinen U, John J, Klavus J, Leu R E, Nolan B, O'Donnell O, Propper C, Puffer F, Schellhorn M, Sundberg G, Winkelhake O
Department of Health Policy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
J Health Econ. 2000 Sep;19(5):553-83. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00050-3.
This paper presents a comparison of horizontal equity in health care utilization in 10 European countries and the US. It does not only extend previous work by using more recent data from a larger set of countries, but also uses new methods and presents disaggregated results by various types of care. In all countries, the lower-income groups are more intensive users of the health care system. But after indirect standardization for need differences, there is little or no evidence of significant inequity in the delivery of health care overall, though in half of the countries, significant pro-rich inequity emerges for physician contacts. This seems to be due mainly to a higher use of medical specialist services by higher-income groups and a higher use of GP care among lower-income groups. These findings appear to be fairly general and emerge in countries with very diverse characteristics regarding access and provider incentives.
本文对10个欧洲国家和美国医疗保健利用方面的横向公平性进行了比较。它不仅通过使用来自更多国家的更新数据扩展了先前的研究工作,还采用了新方法并按各类医疗服务呈现了分类结果。在所有国家,低收入群体都是医疗保健系统的更密集使用者。但在对需求差异进行间接标准化之后,总体上几乎没有或没有证据表明医疗保健提供方面存在显著不公平,不过在一半的国家中,在医生诊疗方面出现了显著的有利于富人的不公平现象。这似乎主要是由于高收入群体更多地使用医学专科服务,而低收入群体更多地使用全科医生服务。这些发现似乎相当普遍,在获取医疗服务和提供者激励措施方面具有非常不同特征的国家中都出现了。