Sutton Matthew
Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, UK.
Health Econ. 2002 Sep;11(6):537-49. doi: 10.1002/hec.752.
Health status varies across socio-economic groups and health status is generally assumed to predict health care needs. Therefore the need for health care varies across socio-economic groups, and studies of equity in the distribution of health care between socio-economic groups must compare levels of utilisation with levels of need. Economic studies of equity in health care generally assume that health care needs can be derived from the current health-health care relationship. They therefore do not consider whether the current health-health care relationship is (vertically) equitable and the focus is restricted to horizontal inequity. This paper proposes a framework for incorporating the implications of vertical inequity for the socio-economic distribution of health care. An alternative to the current health-health care relationship is proposed using a restriction on the health-elasticity of health care. The health-elasticity of general practitioner contacts in Scotland is found to be generally negative, but positive at low levels of health status. Pro-rich estimates of horizontal inequity and vertical inequity are obtained but neither is statistically significant. Further analysis demonstrates that the magnitude of vertical inequity in health care may be larger than horizontal inequity.
健康状况因社会经济群体而异,并且通常认为健康状况能够预测医疗保健需求。因此,不同社会经济群体对医疗保健的需求也各不相同,而对不同社会经济群体之间医疗保健分配公平性的研究必须将利用水平与需求水平进行比较。医疗保健公平性的经济研究通常假定,医疗保健需求可以从当前的健康与医疗保健关系中推导出来。因此,它们没有考虑当前的健康与医疗保健关系是否(纵向)公平,并且关注点仅限于横向不公平。本文提出了一个框架,用于纳入纵向不公平对医疗保健社会经济分配的影响。通过对医疗保健的健康弹性施加限制,提出了一种替代当前健康与医疗保健关系的方法。研究发现,苏格兰全科医生诊疗的健康弹性总体为负,但在健康状况较低水平时为正。得出了有利于富人的横向不公平和纵向不公平估计值,但两者均无统计学意义。进一步分析表明,医疗保健中纵向不公平的程度可能大于横向不公平。