Forrest M, Robb M
Cairns Library, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 9 DU, UK.
Health Libr Rev. 2000 Sep;17(3):129-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2000.00285.x.
The objective of this study was to find out more about the information needs of doctors-in-training and to identify their preferred sources of information. The methodology included interviews with consultants and administrators, a focus group discussion with library staff and a postal questionnaire sent to 347 doctors-in-training (there was a 43% return). The shortcomings of a questionnaire primarily composed of closed questions were addressed by the inclusion of one-to-one interviews which offered the opportunity for more in-depth commentary on specific issues highlighted in the questionnaire. Results indicated the frequency with which various types of information sources were consulted and how this related to the 'ease of access' of each information source. There was also the opportunity to comment on future information needs. It was clear from the interviews as well as comments made on the questionnaire that the two most important requirements for doctors-in-training were 'more time to find and obtain information' and 'better access to information sources when and where they are needed'. The results, although not surprising, included specific suggestions that have been used for the strategic planning of the library service to deliver the best possible support to users within the current framework of evidence-based medicine.
本研究的目的是进一步了解实习医生的信息需求,并确定他们偏爱的信息来源。研究方法包括与顾问和管理人员进行访谈、与图书馆工作人员进行焦点小组讨论,以及向347名实习医生发送邮政调查问卷(回收率为43%)。通过纳入一对一访谈解决了主要由封闭式问题组成的问卷的缺点,一对一访谈为对问卷中突出的具体问题进行更深入的评论提供了机会。结果表明了查阅各类信息来源的频率以及这与每个信息来源的“获取便利性”之间的关系。此外,还有机会对未来的信息需求发表意见。从访谈以及问卷上的评论可以明显看出,实习医生的两个最重要需求是“有更多时间查找和获取信息”以及“在需要时和需要的地点能更好地获取信息来源”。这些结果虽不出人意料,但包含了一些具体建议,已被用于图书馆服务的战略规划,以便在当前循证医学框架内为用户提供尽可能好的支持。