Suppr超能文献

重症急性胰腺炎中的腹水:从病理生理学到治疗

Ascites fluid in severe acute pancreatitis: from pathophysiology to therapy.

作者信息

Dugernier T, Laterre P F, Reynaert M S

机构信息

Intensive Care Department, St Luc University Hospital, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Brussels.

出版信息

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2000 Jul-Sep;63(3):264-8.

Abstract

Several pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in the development of the inflammatory necrotizing process that takes place in the retroperitoneal area during the early phase of acute pancreatitis. They include premature intraglandular activation of pancreatic proenzymes (zymogens) and in particular trypsin, early microcirculatory impairment with subsequent ischaemia/reperfusion and overstimulation of immune effector cells. Although intra-acinar or interstitial activation of trypsinogen is most probably the trigger of acute pancreatitis, in recent years much emphasis has been put on the role of leukocytes. Based on numerous experimental and human data several pro-inflammatory mediators including cytokines, arachidonic acid derivatives, activated oxygen species and proteases are released locally by overactivated neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages among other cells. They are now believed to play a central role in the development of pancreatic necrosis and, once they gain access to the systemic circulation, in the emergence of early multisystem organ failure. However the sequential and relative contribution of each of these 3 pathophysiological mechanisms remain controversial and the precise identification of the mediators incriminated in local and remote tissue injury is still awaited. Severe acute pancreatitis still carries a mortality of 20% to 30%. With advances in intensive care management 80% of the deaths occur somewhat late in the attack due to infected pancreatic necrosis. Nevertheless early remote organ failures still remain a lifethreatening condition for most of these patients. A peritoneal exudate rich in activated lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes, vasoactive substances and several other pro-inflammatory mediators collect in over 60% of the patients with severe acute pancreatitis. On the basis of favourable animal experiments early percutaneous or surgical peritoneal lavage with or without the addition of antiproteases has been carried out in human acute pancreatitis. The rationale behind this procedure was the washout of potential toxic mediators from the peritoneal cavity before they gain access to the systemic circulation. Contrary to animal and uncontrolled human data no prospective randomized study could ever demonstrated a significant effect of peritoneal lavage neither in the prevention and control of remote organ failures or in early mortality and ultimate survival after severe acute pancreatitis in humans. Differences between experimentally-induced pancreatitis, difference in the timing of the initiation of lavage and a type II error in controlled human studies may account for the discrepancy in the outcome between these studies. Anyway, this disparity should raise the question as whether the peritoneal cavity acts simply as a reservoir or as a route of transfer of toxic mediators to the systemic circulation. Although data are scarce, conflicting and limited to animal experiments and to a few molecules, peripancreatic veins and lymphatics seem to be the major routes of transfer whereas transperitoneal absorption is trivial. Nevertheless early peritoneal aspiration of ascitic fluid in acute pancreatitis and measurement of trypsinogen activation peptides may be used as a means of severity assessment and identification of pancreatic necrosis. This implies that even if not taking part actively in the emergence of remote organ failures ascitic fluid may reflect the peripancreatic necrotizing process. So careful comparative analysis of peritoneal exudate, plasma and lymph with regards to putative mediators of local and remote injury may provide essential pathophysiological clues. At the time of trials of antimediator therapy early in the attack this kind of insight is essential.

摘要

在急性胰腺炎早期,腹膜后区域发生的炎症坏死过程涉及多种病理生理机制。这些机制包括胰腺酶原(特别是胰蛋白酶)在腺体内过早激活、早期微循环障碍及随后的缺血/再灌注,以及免疫效应细胞的过度刺激。尽管胰蛋白酶原在腺泡内或间质中的激活很可能是急性胰腺炎的触发因素,但近年来白细胞的作用受到了更多关注。基于大量实验和人体数据,多种促炎介质,包括细胞因子、花生四烯酸衍生物、活性氧和蛋白酶,由过度激活的中性粒细胞和单核细胞/巨噬细胞等细胞局部释放。现在认为它们在胰腺坏死的发展中起核心作用,一旦进入体循环,还会导致早期多系统器官功能衰竭。然而,这三种病理生理机制中每种机制的先后顺序及相对作用仍存在争议,对于导致局部和远处组织损伤的介质的确切鉴定仍有待明确。重症急性胰腺炎的死亡率仍为20%至30%。随着重症监护管理的进展,80%的死亡发生在发病后期,原因是胰腺坏死感染。尽管如此,早期远处器官功能衰竭对大多数这类患者来说仍然是危及生命的情况。超过60%的重症急性胰腺炎患者会出现富含活性脂解酶、蛋白水解酶、血管活性物质和其他几种促炎介质的腹膜渗出液。基于有利的动物实验,在人类急性胰腺炎中已进行了早期经皮或手术腹膜灌洗,灌洗中可添加或不添加抗蛋白酶。该操作的理论依据是在潜在毒性介质进入体循环之前将其从腹腔冲洗掉。与动物实验和非对照人体数据相反,没有前瞻性随机研究能够证明腹膜灌洗对预防和控制远处器官功能衰竭、降低重症急性胰腺炎患者的早期死亡率及最终生存率有显著效果。实验性胰腺炎之间的差异、灌洗开始时间的不同以及对照人体研究中的II类错误可能解释了这些研究结果的差异。无论如何,这种差异应引发一个问题,即腹腔仅仅是一个储存库,还是毒性介质进入体循环的一条途径。尽管数据稀少、相互矛盾且仅限于动物实验和少数分子,但胰周静脉和淋巴管似乎是主要的转移途径,而经腹膜吸收微不足道。然而,急性胰腺炎早期腹腔积液的抽吸及胰蛋白酶原激活肽的测量可作为严重程度评估和胰腺坏死鉴定的手段。这意味着即使腹腔积液不积极参与远处器官功能衰竭的发生,也可能反映胰周坏死过程。因此,仔细比较分析腹膜渗出液、血浆和淋巴液中局部和远处损伤的假定介质,可能提供重要的病理生理线索。在发病早期进行抗介质治疗试验时,这种见解至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验