Smith H A, Lee S H, O'Neill P A, Connolly M J
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK.
Age Ageing. 2000 Nov;29(6):495-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/29.6.495.
dysphagia is common in acute stroke. Accurate detection of the presence or absence of aspiration by bedside swallowing assessment is difficult without objective methods, tending to over-diagnose aspiration. As a result, some patients suffer restricted oral intake unnecessarily.
we examined the predictive values of pulse oximetry and speech and language therapy bedside swallowing assessment in the detection of aspiration compared with videofluoroscopy.
a double-blind observational study.
two university teaching hospitals.
we studied 53 patients whose acute strokes were confirmed by computed tomography scan.
Each subject had initial standard bedside swallowing assessment, closely followed by simultaneous and mutually blinded pulse oximetry, swallowing assessment and videofluoroscopy.
15 of 53 subjects aspirated. Bedside swallowing assessment and saturation assessment at > or = 2% desaturation gave good sensitivity (80% and 87% respectively), but low positive predictive values (50% and 36% respectively). Both assessments mistook laryngeal penetration for aspiration. Re-analysis with aspiration +/- penetration as a new endpoint improved bedside swallowing assessment positive predictive values to 83% (chi2 =3.59, P=0.032). Sensitivity of saturation assessment was maintained at 86%, positive predictive values of saturation assessment improved to 69% (chi2=6.74, P=0.009). The combination of bedside swallowing assessment and saturation assessment versus aspiration + penetration gave a positive predictive value of 95%.
screening by saturation assessments detects 86% of aspirators/penetrators and should be followed immediately by bedside swallowing assessment, as the combination of the two assessments gives the best positive predictive value. For patients with acute stroke, we advocate a 10 ml water-swallow screening test with simultaneous pulse oximetry by suitably trained medical and nursing staff. Use of this screening test would improve dysphagia detection whilst minimizing unnecessary restriction of oral intake in stroke patients.
吞咽困难在急性脑卒中患者中很常见。在缺乏客观方法的情况下,通过床边吞咽评估准确检测是否存在误吸很困难,容易过度诊断误吸。因此,一些患者不必要地限制了经口摄入量。
与电视荧光吞咽造影检查相比,我们研究了脉搏血氧饱和度测定以及言语和语言治疗床边吞咽评估在检测误吸方面的预测价值。
双盲观察性研究。
两家大学教学医院。
我们研究了53例经计算机断层扫描确诊为急性脑卒中的患者。
每位受试者首先进行标准的床边吞咽评估,随后立即同时进行相互独立的脉搏血氧饱和度测定、吞咽评估和电视荧光吞咽造影检查。
53例受试者中有15例发生误吸。床边吞咽评估以及饱和度下降≥2%时的饱和度评估具有较高的灵敏度(分别为80%和87%),但阳性预测值较低(分别为50%和36%)。两种评估方法均将喉穿透误判为误吸。将误吸±穿透作为新的终点重新分析后,床边吞咽评估的阳性预测值提高到83%(χ2=3.59,P=0.032)。饱和度评估的灵敏度维持在86%,阳性预测值提高到69%(χ2=6.74,P=0.009)。床边吞咽评估与饱和度评估相结合对误吸+穿透的阳性预测值为95%。
通过饱和度评估进行筛查可检测出86%的误吸者/穿透者,随后应立即进行床边吞咽评估,因为两种评估方法相结合可获得最佳的阳性预测值。对于急性脑卒中患者,我们提倡由经过适当培训的医护人员进行10毫升水吞咽筛查试验并同时进行脉搏血氧饱和度测定。使用这种筛查试验可改善吞咽困难的检测,同时尽量减少对脑卒中患者经口摄入量的不必要限制。