Marian Thomas, Schröder Jens, Muhle Paul, Claus Inga, Oelenberg Stephan, Hamacher Christina, Warnecke Tobias, Suntrup-Krüger Sonja, Dziewas Rainer
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;7(1):44-50. doi: 10.1159/000453083. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
Dysphagia is one of the most dangerous symptoms of acute stroke. Various screening tools have been suggested for the early detection of this condition. In spite of conflicting results, measurement of oxygen saturation (SpO2) during clinical swallowing assessment is still recommended by different national guidelines as a screening tool with a decline in SpO2 ≥2% usually being regarded as a marker of aspiration. This paper assesses the sensitivity of SpO2 measurements for the evaluation of aspiration risk in acute stroke patients.
Fifty acute stroke patients with moderate to severe dysphagia were included in this study. In all patients, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was performed according to a standardised protocol. Blinded to the results of FEES, SpO2 was monitored simultaneously. The degree of desaturation during/after swallows with aspiration was compared to the degree of desaturation during/after swallows without aspiration in a swallow-to-swallow analysis of each patient. To minimise potential confounders, every patient served as their control.
In each subject, a swallow with and a swallow without aspiration were analysed. Overall, aspiration seen in FEES was related to a minor decline in SpO2 (mean SpO2 without aspiration 95.54 ± 2.7% vs. mean SpO2 with aspiration 95.28 ± 2.7%). However, a significant desaturation ≥2% occurred only in 5 patients during/after aspiration. There was no correlation between aspiration/dysphagia severity or the amount of aspirated material and SpO2 levels.
According to this study, measurement of oxygen desaturation is not a suitable screening tool for the detection of aspiration in stroke patients.
吞咽困难是急性中风最危险的症状之一。已提出各种筛查工具用于早期检测这种情况。尽管结果相互矛盾,但不同国家指南仍推荐在临床吞咽评估期间测量血氧饱和度(SpO2)作为一种筛查工具,SpO2下降≥2%通常被视为误吸的标志。本文评估SpO2测量对评估急性中风患者误吸风险的敏感性。
本研究纳入了50例患有中度至重度吞咽困难的急性中风患者。对所有患者按照标准化方案进行纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)。在不知道FEES结果的情况下,同时监测SpO2。在对每位患者的逐次吞咽分析中,将有误吸的吞咽期间/之后的血氧饱和度下降程度与无误吸的吞咽期间/之后的血氧饱和度下降程度进行比较。为了尽量减少潜在的混杂因素,每位患者都作为自己的对照。
在每个受试者中,分析了一次有误吸的吞咽和一次无误吸的吞咽。总体而言,FEES中观察到的误吸与SpO2的轻微下降有关(无误吸时的平均SpO2为95.54±2.7%,有误吸时的平均SpO2为95.28±2.7%)。然而,只有5例患者在误吸期间/之后出现了≥2%的显著血氧饱和度下降。误吸/吞咽困难严重程度或误吸物量与SpO2水平之间没有相关性。
根据本研究,血氧饱和度下降测量不是检测中风患者误吸的合适筛查工具。