Spatial summation and center-surround antagonism in the receptive field of single units in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of cat: comparison with retinal input.

Spatial summation and degree of center-surround antagonism were examined in the receptive field of nonlagged cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). We recorded responses to stationary light or dark circular spots that were stepwise varied in width. The spots were centered on the receptive field. For a sample of nonlagged X-cells, we made simultaneous recordings of action potentials and S-potentials, and could thereby compare spatial summation in the dLGN cell and in the retinal input to the cell. Plots of response versus spot diameter showed that the response for a dLGN cell was consistently below the response in the retinal input at all spot sizes. There was a marked increase of antagonism at the retinogeniculate relay. The difference between the retinal input and dLGN cell response suggested that the direct retinal input to a relay cell is counteracted in dLGN by an inhibitory field that has an antagonistic center-surround organization. The inhibitory field seems to have the same center sign (ON- or OFF-center), but a wider receptive-field center than the direct retinal input to the relay cell. The broader center of the inhibitory field can explain the increased center-surround antagonism at the retinogeniculate relay. The ratio between the response of a dLGN cell and its retinal input (transfer ratio) varied with spot width. This variation did not necessarily reflect a nonlinearity at the retinogeniculate relay. Plots of dLGN cell response against retinal input were piecewise linear, suggesting that both excitatory and inhibitory transmission in dLGN are close to linear. The variation in transfer ratio could be explained by sustained suppression evoked by the background stimulation, because such suppression has relatively stronger effect on the response to a spot evoking weak response than to a spot evoking a strong response. A simple model for the spatial receptive-field organization of nonlagged X-cells, that is consistent with our findings, is presented.