Walton T E
United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;916:36-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05271.x.
For decades the veterinary services of the United States and other nations protected their livestock and poultry industries from the ravages of introduced animal diseases by rigorous import restrictions. This policy of zero risk frequently translated to no or reduced trade in animals and animal products or dramatic trade inequities. However, GATT articles enforced by the WTO require that imported products be treated no less favorably than domestically produced goods with regard to animal health restrictions. Under authority from the WTO, the OIE establishes recommendations and guidelines for the regulation of trade in animals and products of animal origin through the OIE International Animal Health Code, sets animal health standards, and reports global animal health situations and statuses. Diseases often have a dramatic impact on the animal agricultural industries of a nation--disease outbreaks may be deleterious to the competitiveness of the products of one nation but offer opportunities for others. The potential dangers of lax vigilance, insufficient scientifically valid data, inadequate SPS measures, and errors in assessing risk can turn the heady experience of seemingly unlimited growth in international markets and demand for one's products into a catastrophic return to reality. The experience of the United Kingdom and countries of Europe with bovine spongiform encephalopathy is a case in point. It is estimated that the cost of the outbreak of this disease to the economy of the UK has been more than $3 billion. Responses of their trading partners, including the US, to this outbreak were abrupt and restrictive. Although the decision was controversial, the US stopped importation of live cattle from the UK in the late 1980's and subsequently, in 1997, importation of all products of ruminant origin was stopped from all countries of Europe. The transmission of the disease to continental Europe and the disclosure that the pathogen was associated with a fatal human illness, rocked consumer confidence in the safety of the UK beef supply, brought down the ruling political party in the UK, and forced major changes in the beef industry.
几十年来,美国和其他国家的兽医服务机构通过严格的进口限制措施,保护本国的畜禽产业免受外来动物疾病的侵害。这种零风险政策常常导致动物及动物产品贸易的减少或完全停滞,或者造成严重的贸易不平等。然而,世界贸易组织(WTO)所执行的关贸总协定条款要求,在动物卫生限制方面,进口产品应与国内生产的产品受到同等优惠的待遇。在世贸组织的授权下,国际兽疫局(OIE)通过《国际动物卫生法典》制定有关动物及动物源性产品贸易监管的建议和准则,设定动物卫生标准,并报告全球动物卫生状况。疾病往往会对一个国家的畜牧业产生巨大影响——疾病爆发可能会损害一个国家产品的竞争力,但却为其他国家提供了机会。警惕性不足、缺乏科学有效的数据、动植物卫生检疫措施不完善以及风险评估失误所带来的潜在危险,可能会使在国际市场上看似无限增长的产品需求以及自身产品的畅销体验,瞬间转变为残酷的现实。英国和欧洲其他国家爆发牛海绵状脑病的经历就是一个典型例子。据估计,这场疾病给英国经济造成的损失超过30亿美元。包括美国在内的英国贸易伙伴对此次疫情的反应迅速且严格。尽管这一决定颇具争议,但美国在20世纪80年代末停止了从英国进口活牛,随后在1997年,停止了从欧洲所有国家进口所有反刍动物源性产品。该疾病在欧洲大陆的传播以及病原体与一种致命人类疾病有关的披露,动摇了消费者对英国牛肉供应安全的信心,导致英国执政政党下台,并迫使牛肉行业发生重大变革。