• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州外法医检查的执业许可要求。

Licensure requirements for out-of-state forensic examinations.

作者信息

Reid W H

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2000;28(4):433-7.

PMID:11196253
Abstract

Forensic clinicians, including psychiatrists, are sometimes asked to perform solely forensic (e.g., court- or litigation-related) assessments or interviews outside states in which they are licensed. A short survey was sent to all U.S. state medical licensing agencies asking whether or not a psychiatrist licensed in another state must also be licensed in the surveyed state before performing a purely forensic interview or examination. Of the 45 states responding, 21 said that no additional "local" license would be required; 6 gave unclear responses; and 18 said a local license would generally be required. At least 7 of the 18 states that generally require a local license accept unlicensed out-of-state physicians when they are requested by or consulting to an in-state physician. The state's definition of "medical practice" figured heavily in many responses. No pattern of state size (area), population density, or geographic location was discerned. The materials received, comments by board staff and attorneys, and interpretations or assumptions by the author are not to be construed as "official" for any state.

摘要

法医临床医生,包括精神科医生,有时会被要求在其未获得执业许可的州以外单独进行法医(如与法庭或诉讼相关的)评估或面谈。向美国所有州医疗许可机构发送了一份简短的调查问卷,询问在另一个州获得许可的精神科医生在进行纯粹的法医面谈或检查之前是否也必须在被调查州获得许可。在回复的45个州中,21个州表示不需要额外的“本地”许可;6个州给出了不明确的回复;18个州表示通常需要本地许可。在通常要求本地许可的18个州中,至少有7个州在州内医生请求或咨询时会接受无本地许可的州外医生。许多回复中,该州对“医疗执业”的定义起着重要作用。未发现州面积、人口密度或地理位置的模式。所收到的材料、委员会工作人员和律师的评论以及作者的解释或假设,不应被视为任何州的“官方”意见。

相似文献

1
Licensure requirements for out-of-state forensic examinations.州外法医检查的执业许可要求。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2000;28(4):433-7.
2
Conducting forensic examinations on the road: are you practicing your profession without a license?在路上进行法医检查:你是在无证执业吗?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(1):75-82.
3
Protecting the public: state medical board licensure policies for active and inactive physicians.保护公众:针对在职和非在职医生的州医学委员会执照政策
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):643-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1017.
4
Crossing boundaries: a comprehensive survey of medical licensing laws and guidelines regulating the interstate practice of pathology.跨越边界:医学许可法律和规范病理学州际实践的指南的全面调查。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Mar;38(3):e1-5. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000168.
5
A survey of state medical licensing boards: can the travelling team physician practice in your state?州医学执照委员会调查:巡回队医生可否在贵州行医?
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):60-2. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091460. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
6
Medical licensure for osteopathic physicians in Louisiana: why the State Board of Medical Examiners should accept the NBOME.路易斯安那州整骨疗法医生的医疗执照:为什么医学考试委员会应该接受国家整骨疗法医学考试委员会(NBOME)。
J La State Med Soc. 1995 Oct;147(10):431-4.
7
The future of medical licensure in the United States.美国医疗执照的未来。
Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12 Suppl):S36-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243351.57047.2e.
8
Establishing a national clearinghouse on international medical education programs: an idea whose time has finally come.建立一个关于国际医学教育项目的国家信息交换中心:一个时机终于成熟的想法。
Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):305-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181636f10.
9
How to get your license: a state-by-state guide.如何获取你的执照:各州指南。
Resid Staff Physician. 1988 May;34(5):63-4, 67-82, 87 passim.
10
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.