Norman M, James P
Audiology Department, Woodford Williams Wing, Sunderland Royal Hospital, UK.
Br J Audiol. 2000 Dec;34(6):375-7. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000153.
Differences between insertion gain measurements and coupler measurements were investigated using two different hearing aids, to assess the accuracy of hearing aid fitting methods which involve the use of real-ear-to-coupler differences (RECDs). The hearing aids used were the NHS BE19 and the Lavis X11. They were allocated alternately to 80 new adult hearing aid users, and insertion gain measurement was carried out with the allocated aid on all subjects, and with both hearing aids on 36 subjects. Coupler measurements were also carried out with both hearing aids, at two different gain settings. Comparison of the coupler measurements and the insertion gain measurements suggests that the differences in insertion gain produced by different hearing aids cannot be predicted accurately from the differences in coupler gain measurements produced by the same aids. Although the use of RECDs measured using insert earphones may accurately predict the real-ear performance of some models of hearing aid, this method may not produce equally satisfactory results with other models.
使用两种不同的助听器研究了插入增益测量与耦合器测量之间的差异,以评估涉及使用真耳到耦合器差异(RECD)的助听器验配方法的准确性。所使用的助听器为NHS BE19和Lavis X11。它们被交替分配给80名新的成年助听器使用者,对所有受试者使用分配的助听器进行插入增益测量,对36名受试者使用两种助听器进行测量。还对两种助听器在两种不同增益设置下进行了耦合器测量。耦合器测量与插入增益测量的比较表明,不同助听器产生的插入增益差异无法从同一助听器产生的耦合器增益测量差异中准确预测。尽管使用插入式耳机测量的RECD可能准确预测某些型号助听器的真耳性能,但该方法对其他型号可能不会产生同样令人满意的结果。