Suppr超能文献

真耳与耦合腔差值的心理物理学测量与物理测量的比较。

Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.

作者信息

Koning Raphael, Wouters Jan, Francart Tom

机构信息

Research Group Experimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):543-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000159.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study is to compare real ear to coupler difference (RECD) curves based on physical and psychophysical measures. For the physically measured RECD, the RECD was measured with real ear and coupler measurements for the ear simulator and HA1- and HA2 2-cc couplers. The psychophysically measured RECDs were derived from audiogram measures.

DESIGN

RECDs were measured in 19 normally hearing subjects. The coupler measurement was done with the probe microphone and the coupler microphone itself. Psychophysically measured RECDs were derived for all subjects by measuring the audiogram in sound field and with an ER-3A insert phone.

RESULTS

Reference data were obtained for the three coupler types. It was possible to derive the RECD curve with psychophysical methods. There was no overall statistical difference between the physically and psychophysically measured RECD curves for the HA2 2-cc coupler and the ear simulator. The standard deviation was, however, much higher for the psychophysically derived RECD, indicating that physically measured RECDs are more precise than psychophysically derived RECDs.

CONCLUSIONS

For the physical RECD measurements, the coupler microphone should be used for the coupler measurement. Physically measured RECDs were validated on group level by the reliable derivation of the RECD curve from audiogram measures.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是基于物理和心理物理测量方法比较真耳与耦合器差值(RECD)曲线。对于物理测量的RECD,通过对耳模拟器以及HA1和HA2 2立方厘米耦合器进行真耳和耦合器测量来获取RECD。心理物理测量的RECD则源自听力图测量。

设计

对19名听力正常的受试者进行RECD测量。耦合器测量使用探头麦克风和耦合器麦克风本身进行。通过在声场中以及使用ER - 3A插入式耳机测量听力图,为所有受试者得出心理物理测量的RECD。

结果

获得了三种耦合器类型的参考数据。可以通过心理物理方法得出RECD曲线。对于HA2 2立方厘米耦合器和耳模拟器,物理测量和心理物理测量的RECD曲线之间总体上没有统计学差异。然而,心理物理得出的RECD的标准差要高得多,这表明物理测量的RECD比心理物理得出的RECD更精确。

结论

对于物理RECD测量,耦合器测量应使用耦合器麦克风。通过从听力图测量可靠地得出RECD曲线,在群体水平上验证了物理测量的RECD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验