Holst H, Måre K, Järund A, Aström K, Evander E, Tägil K, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L
Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Sweden.
Eur J Nucl Med. 2001 Jan;28(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s002590000409.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new automated method for the interpretation of lung perfusion scintigrams using patients from a hospital other than that where the method was developed, and then to compare the performance of the technique against that of experienced physicians. A total of 1,087 scintigrams from patients with suspected pulmonary embolism comprised the training group. The test group consisted of scintigrams from 140 patients collected in a hospital different to that from which the training group had been drawn. An artificial neural network was trained using 18 automatically obtained features from each set of perfusion scintigrams. The image processing techniques included alignment to templates, construction of quotient images based on the perfusion/template images, and finally calculation of features describing segmental perfusion defects in the quotient images. The templates represented lungs of normal size and shape without any pathological changes. The performance of the neural network was compared with that of three experienced physicians who read the same test scintigrams according to the modified PIOPED criteria using, in addition to perfusion images, ventilation images when available and chest radiographs for all patients. Performances were measured as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The performance of the neural network evaluated in the test group was 0.88 (95% confidence limits 0.81-0.94). The performance of the three experienced experts was in the range 0.87-0.93 when using the perfusion images, chest radiographs and ventilation images when available. Perfusion scintigrams can be interpreted regarding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by the use of an automated method also in a hospital other than that where it was developed. The performance of this method is similar to that of experienced physicians even though the physicians, in addition to perfusion images, also had access to ventilation images for most patients and chest radiographs for all patients. These results show the high potential for the method as a clinical decision support system.
本研究的目的是使用来自该方法研发医院以外的一家医院的患者,评估一种用于解读肺灌注闪烁扫描图的新型自动化方法,然后将该技术的性能与经验丰富的医生的性能进行比较。共有1087例疑似肺栓塞患者的闪烁扫描图组成了训练组。测试组由在一家与训练组所抽取医院不同的医院收集的140例患者的闪烁扫描图组成。使用从每组灌注闪烁扫描图自动获取的18个特征对人工神经网络进行训练。图像处理技术包括与模板对齐、基于灌注/模板图像构建商图像,最后计算描述商图像中节段性灌注缺损的特征。模板代表大小和形状正常且无任何病理变化的肺。将神经网络的性能与三位经验丰富的医生的性能进行比较,这三位医生根据改良的PIOPED标准解读相同的测试闪烁扫描图,除了灌注图像外,还使用所有患者可用的通气图像和胸部X光片。性能通过受试者操作特征曲线下的面积来衡量。在测试组中评估的神经网络的性能为0.88(95%置信区间0.81 - 0.94)。三位经验丰富的专家在使用灌注图像、胸部X光片以及可用的通气图像时,性能范围为0.87 - 0.93。即使在该方法研发医院以外的医院,使用自动化方法也可以解读关于肺栓塞诊断的灌注闪烁扫描图。该方法的性能与经验丰富的医生相似,尽管医生除了灌注图像外,大多数患者还能获取通气图像,所有患者都能获取胸部X光片。这些结果表明该方法作为临床决策支持系统具有很高的潜力。