Intrafaculty College of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 1 Debinki St., 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 1 Debinki St., 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;16(7):1303. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071303.
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of artificial neural networks in Alzheimer disease diagnosis (AD) using data of brain single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The results were compared with discriminant analysis. The study population consisted of 132 clinically diagnosed patients. There were 72 subjects with AD and 60 belonging to the normal control group. The artificial neural network used 36 numerical values being the count numbers obtained for each area of brain SPECT. These numbers determined the set of input data for the artificial neural network. The sensitivity of Alzheimer disease diagnosis detection by artificial neural network and discriminant analysis were 93.8% and 86.1%, respectively, and the corresponding specificity was 100% and 95%. We also used receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and areas under receiver operating characteristics curves were correspondingly 0.97 ( < 0.0001) for the artificial neural networks (ANN) and 0.96 ( < 0.0001) for discriminant analysis. In conclusion, artificial neural networks and conventional statistics methods (discriminant analysis) are a useful tool in Alzheimer disease diagnosis.
本研究旨在利用脑单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的数据证明人工神经网络在阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断中的作用。结果与判别分析进行了比较。研究人群包括 132 名临床诊断的患者。其中 72 例为 AD 患者,60 例为正常对照组。人工神经网络使用 36 个数值,这些数值是脑 SPECT 每个区域的计数。这些数字确定了人工神经网络的输入数据集。人工神经网络和判别分析检测 AD 的灵敏度分别为 93.8%和 86.1%,相应的特异性分别为 100%和 95%。我们还使用了接收者操作特性曲线(ROC)分析,人工神经网络(ANN)的曲线下面积为 0.97(<0.0001),判别分析的曲线下面积为 0.96(<0.0001)。总之,人工神经网络和传统统计学方法(判别分析)是 AD 诊断的有用工具。