Mauro G, Tagliaferro G, Montini M, Zanolla L
Istituto di Clinica Odontoiatrica Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Università degli Studi di Parma, Italy.
J Orofac Pain. 2001 Winter;15(1):36-46.
To address the following questions: (1) Which words are preferred by different groups of orofacial pain patients to describe their pain experience? (2) Is it possible, based on such descriptions, to obtain a clinical differential diagnosis in these patients? (3) Is there any relationship between the verbal description of pain and self-rated quality of life (QOL)? (4) Can a pattern of modulation of pain language by affective variables (diffusion model) be recognized in orofacial pain patients, as it has in other chronic pain patients? and (5) If so, what might be the clinical usefulness of assessing pain language in these patients?
A total of 332 consecutive orofacial pain patients filled out an Italian Pain Questionnaire (the Italian analog of the McGill Pain Questionnaire) and were then divided into 6 diagnostic subgroups (sample 1) based on history and clinical findings. In a double-blind setting, the distribution of pain descriptors and indexes was statistically evaluated. From sample 1, a randomly selected sample of 121 patients (sample 2) also filled out a QOL categorical scale. The results of both tests in this sample were compared statistically.
Some significant differences among diagnostic subgroups were found for choice of descriptors and for pain intensity. When a patient's pain description was compared to the corresponding self-evaluation of QOL, a self-perceived worsening of QOL revealed a good correlation with an increase in the number of words chosen, pain intensity, and affective and sensory pain descriptors. A similar significant association was found between self-assessed anxiety and/or depression and the same items.
Although trends in patients' choice of descriptors were evident, differential diagnosis based on only a pain questionnaire was not possible in the different groups of orofacial pain patients examined in this study. The present study suggests the presence of a phenomenon of diffusion in the language of those patients who were experiencing a worsening of their QOL as a result of pain and consequent psychologic distress. This observation can be of clinical usefulness by enhancing the sensitivity of the clinician to the suffering and affective distress experienced by the patient, and it also can be helpful in refining the therapeutic approach for each individual patient.
解决以下问题:(1)不同组的口面部疼痛患者更倾向用哪些词汇来描述他们的疼痛体验?(2)基于这些描述,能否对这些患者进行临床鉴别诊断?(3)疼痛的言语描述与自我评定的生活质量(QOL)之间是否存在关联?(4)在口面部疼痛患者中,是否能像在其他慢性疼痛患者中那样识别出情感变量对疼痛语言的调节模式(扩散模型)?以及(5)如果可以,评估这些患者的疼痛语言在临床上有何用处?
总共332名连续的口面部疼痛患者填写了一份意大利疼痛问卷(麦吉尔疼痛问卷的意大利语版本),然后根据病史和临床检查结果分为6个诊断亚组(样本1)。在双盲环境下,对疼痛描述词和指数的分布进行统计学评估。从样本1中随机抽取121名患者组成样本2,他们还填写了一份生活质量分类量表。对该样本中两项测试的结果进行统计学比较。
在诊断亚组之间,发现描述词的选择和疼痛强度存在一些显著差异。当将患者的疼痛描述与其相应的生活质量自我评估进行比较时,自我感知的生活质量恶化与所选词汇数量的增加、疼痛强度以及情感和感觉疼痛描述词之间显示出良好的相关性。在自我评定的焦虑和/或抑郁与相同项目之间也发现了类似的显著关联。
尽管患者对描述词的选择趋势很明显,但在本研究中所检查的不同组口面部疼痛患者中,仅基于疼痛问卷进行鉴别诊断是不可能的。本研究表明,那些因疼痛及随之而来的心理困扰而生活质量恶化的患者,其语言中存在扩散现象。这一观察结果在临床上可能有用,可提高临床医生对患者所遭受痛苦和情感困扰的敏感性,也有助于为每个患者完善治疗方法。