Linville R C, Pomp D, Johnson R K, Rothschild M F
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2001 Jan;79(1):60-7. doi: 10.2527/2001.79160x.
A candidate gene approach was used to determine whether specific loci explain responses in ovulation rate (OR) and number of fully formed (FF), live (NBA), stillborn, and mummified pigs at birth observed in two lines selected for ovulation rate and litter size compared with a randomly selected control line. Line IOL was selected for an index of OR and embryonic survival for eight generations, followed by eight generations of two-stage selection for OR and litter size. Line C was selected at random for 16 generations. Line COL, derived from line C at Generation 8, underwent eight generations of two-stage selection. Lines IOL and C differed in mean EBV by 6.1 ova and 4.7 FF, whereas lines COL and C differed by 2.2 ova and 2.9 FF. Pigs of Generation 7 of two-stage selection lines were genotyped for the retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4, n = 190) and epidermal growth factor (EGF, n = 189) loci, whereas pigs of Generations 7 and 8 were genotyped for the estrogen receptor (ESR, n = 523), prolactin receptor (PRLR, n = 524), follicle-stimulating hormone beta (FSHbeta, n = 520), and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2, n = 523) loci. Based on chi-square analysis for homogeneity of genotypic frequencies, distributions for PRLR, FSHbeta, and PTGS2 were different among lines (P < 0.005). Differences in gene frequencies between IOL vs C and COL vs C were 0.33 +/- 0.25 and 0.16 +/- 0.26 for PRLR, 0.35 +/- 0.20 and 0.15 +/- 0.24 for FSHbeta, and 0.16 +/- 0.16 and 0.08 +/- 0.18 for PTGS2. Although these differences are consistent with a model of selection acting on these loci, estimates of additive and dominance effects at these loci did not differ from zero (P > 0.05), and several of them had signs inconsistent with the changes in allele frequencies. We were not able to find significant associations between the polymorphic markers and phenotypes studied; however, we cannot rule out that other genetic variation within these candidate genes has an effect on the traits studied.
采用候选基因法来确定特定基因座是否能解释在两个针对排卵率和产仔数进行选择的品系中观察到的排卵率(OR)以及出生时完全成型(FF)、存活(NBA)、死产和木乃伊化仔猪数量的反应,同时与一个随机选择的对照品系进行比较。品系IOL针对排卵率和胚胎存活率指数进行了八代选择,随后针对排卵率和产仔数进行了八代两阶段选择。品系C随机选择了16代。品系COL在第8代从品系C衍生而来,进行了八代两阶段选择。品系IOL和C在平均估计育种值上相差6.1个卵子和4.7个FF,而品系COL和C相差2.2个卵子和2.9个FF。对两阶段选择品系第7代的仔猪进行视黄醇结合蛋白4(RBP4,n = 190)和表皮生长因子(EGF,n = 189)基因座的基因分型,而对第7代和第8代的仔猪进行雌激素受体(ESR,n = 523)、催乳素受体(PRLR,n = 524)、促卵泡激素β(FSHβ,n = 520)和前列腺素内过氧化物合酶2(PTGS2,n = 523)基因座的基因分型。基于卡方分析基因型频率的同质性,PRLR、FSHβ和PTGS2在品系间的分布不同(P < 0.005)。PRLR在IOL与C以及COL与C之间的基因频率差异分别为0.33 ± 0.25和0.16 ± 0.26,FSHβ分别为0.35 ± 0.20和0.15 ± 0.24,PTGS2分别为0.16 ± 0.16和0.08 ± 0.18。尽管这些差异与作用于这些基因座的选择模型一致,但这些基因座的加性和显性效应估计值与零无差异(P > 0.05),其中一些的符号与等位基因频率的变化不一致。我们未能在多态性标记与所研究的表型之间找到显著关联;然而,我们不能排除这些候选基因内的其他遗传变异对所研究的性状有影响。