Lanyon R I
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1104, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2001 Feb;76(1):169-79. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_10.
I conducted an exploratory principal components analysis of 15 scales that evaluate a variety of possible self-serving biases using assessment data from 101 general forensic clients. Three distinct factors emerged, representing exaggeration of psychiatric symptoms versus exaggeration of personal adjustment, exaggeration of virtue, and exaggeration of physical health difficulties. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the findings. The surprising fact that none of the scales contained a significant number of items representing the affirmation or exaggeration of positive mental health adjustment precluded the possibility of finding a specific factor in that area. The factor structure was similar to previous results based on personal injury evaluations alone, suggesting that this 3-factor categorization of self-serving misrepresentation has some degree of generality, at least in forensic settings.
我使用来自101名普通法医鉴定客户的评估数据,对15个评估各种可能的自利偏差的量表进行了探索性主成分分析。出现了三个不同的因素,分别代表精神症状夸大与个人适应夸大、美德夸大以及身体健康困难夸大。验证性因素分析支持了这些发现。令人惊讶的是,没有一个量表包含大量代表积极心理健康适应的肯定或夸大的项目,这排除了在该领域找到特定因素的可能性。该因素结构与之前仅基于人身伤害评估的结果相似,表明这种自利性虚假陈述的三因素分类具有一定程度的普遍性,至少在法医环境中是这样。