• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)反应偏差量表(RBS)的编制与验证

Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.

作者信息

Gervais Roger O, Ben-Porath Yossef S, Wygant Dustin B, Green Paul

机构信息

Neurobehavioural Associates, Canada.

出版信息

Assessment. 2007 Jun;14(2):196-208. doi: 10.1177/1073191106295861.

DOI:10.1177/1073191106295861
PMID:17504891
Abstract

This study describes the development of a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) scale designed to detect negative response bias in forensic neuropsychological or disability assessment settings. The Response Bias Scale (RBS) consists of 28 MMPI-2 items that discriminated between persons who passed or failed the Word Memory Test (WMT), Computerized Assessment of Response Bias (CARB), and/or Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in a sample of 1,212 nonhead-injury disability claimants. Incremental validity of the RBS was evaluated by comparing its ability to detect poor performance on four separate symptom validity tests with that of the F and F(P) scales and the Fake Bad Scale (FBS). The RBS consistently outperformed F, F(P), and FBS. Study results suggest that the RBS may be a useful addition to existing MMPI-2 validity scales and indices in detecting symptom complaints predominantly associated with cognitive response bias and overreporting in forensic neuropsychological and disability assessment settings.

摘要

本研究描述了一种明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI-2)量表的开发,该量表旨在检测法医神经心理学或残疾评估环境中的负面反应偏差。反应偏差量表(RBS)由28个MMPI-2项目组成,这些项目在1212名非头部受伤残疾索赔人的样本中,区分了通过或未通过词语记忆测试(WMT)、反应偏差计算机评估(CARB)和/或记忆伪装测试(TOMM)的人。通过比较RBS与F量表、F(P)量表和假坏量表(FBS)在四个单独的症状效度测试中检测不良表现的能力,评估了RBS的增量效度。RBS始终优于F量表、F(P)量表和FBS。研究结果表明,在法医神经心理学和残疾评估环境中,RBS可能是现有MMPI-2效度量表和指标的有益补充,可用于检测主要与认知反应偏差和过度报告相关的症状主诉。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)反应偏差量表(RBS)的编制与验证
Assessment. 2007 Jun;14(2):196-208. doi: 10.1177/1073191106295861.
2
Differential sensitivity of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and MMPI-2 validity scales to memory complaints.反应偏差量表(RBS)和明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)效度量表对记忆主诉的差异敏感性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1061-79. doi: 10.1080/13854040701756930. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
3
Utility of the response bias scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance.反应偏差量表(RBS)及其他明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)效度量表在预测本顿视觉保持测验(TOMM)表现方面的效用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):777-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
4
Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints.MMPI-2-RF 过度报告量表和 RBS 在评估记忆主诉真实性方面的增量有效性。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Jun;25(4):274-84. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq018. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
5
Further validation of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale: findings from disability and criminal forensic settings.MMPI-2 和 MMPI-2-RF 反应偏差量表的进一步验证:来自残疾和刑事法医环境的发现。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):745-56. doi: 10.1037/a0020042.
6
Detecting negative response bias with the Fake Bad Scale, Response Bias Scale, and Henry-Heilbronner Index of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.使用虚假不良量表、反应偏差量表和明尼苏达多相人格测验-2 的亨利-海布伦纳指数检测负面反应偏差。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;26(2):81-8. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq096. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
7
Examination of the new MMPI-2 Response Bias Scale (Gervais): relationship with MMPI-2 validity scales.新明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2反应偏差量表(热尔韦)的检验:与明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2效度量表的关系
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;29(1):67-72. doi: 10.1080/13803390500488546.
8
Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs.法医神经心理学中的反应效度:不同认知和心理结构的探索性因素分析证据
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 May;13(3):440-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707070373.
9
Comparison of MMPI-2 validity scale scores of personal injury litigants and disability claimants.人身伤害诉讼者和残疾索赔者的 MMPI-2 效度量表评分比较。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;25(8):1403-14. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.613854. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
10
Validation of the MMPI-2 Response Bias Scale and Henry-Heilbronner Index in a U.S. veteran population.验证 MMPI-2 反应偏差量表和亨利-海尔布伦纳指数在美国退伍军人人群中的应用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;26(3):194-204. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr015. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
CAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting.CAT-PD和MMPI-3效度量表可检测模拟的过度报告和报告不足。
J Pers Assess. 2024 Dec 9:1-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315.
2
Relationship of Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) over-reporting scales to performance validity testing in a military neuropsychological sample.军事神经心理学样本中人格评估量表(PAI)过度报告量表与效绩效度测试的关系
Mil Psychol. 2022 Mar 29;34(4):484-493. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.2013059. eCollection 2022.
3
Cognitive Underperformance in a Mixed Neuropsychiatric Sample at Diagnostic Evaluation of Adult ADHD.
成人注意力缺陷多动障碍诊断评估中混合神经精神样本的认知功能低下
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 4;12(21):6926. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216926.
4
Cross validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Cognitive Bias Scale of Scales (CB-SOS) over-reporting indicators in a military sample.在军事样本中对人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CB-SOS)的虚报指标进行交叉验证。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;36(2):192-202. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2160151. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Using machine-learning strategies to solve psychometric problems.运用机器学习策略解决心理计量学问题。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):18922. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23678-9.
6
Future Directions in Performance Validity Assessment to Optimize Detection of Invalid Neuropsychological Test Performance: Special Issue Introduction.优化无效神经心理测试表现检测的表现效度评估未来方向:特刊引言
Psychol Inj Law. 2021;14(4):227-231. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09425-x. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
Validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scale of scales in a mixed clinical sample.验证人格评估量表(PAI)在混合临床样本中的量表。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1844-1859. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1900400. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Replication and cross-validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias scale (CBS) in a mixed clinical sample.在混合临床样本中复制和交叉验证人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CBS)。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1860-1877. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Multidimensional Malingering Criteria for Neuropsychological Assessment: A 20-Year Update of the Malingered Neuropsychological Dysfunction Criteria.多维诈病甄别标准在神经心理学评估中的应用:伪装神经心理功能障碍标准 20 年更新。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Aug 28;35(6):735-764. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa019.
10
Personality and Psychopathology in Adults with Noonan Syndrome.《努南综合征成人的人格与精神病理学》
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Jun;27(2):256-267. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09659-7.