Brook S, Lucey J V, Gunn K P
Research Unit, Sterkfontain Hospital, Krugersdorp, South Africa.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;61(12):933-41. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n1208.
This 7-day, randomized, open-label, multicenter, international study compared the efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular (i.m.) ziprasidone with haloperidol i.m. and the transition from i.m. to oral treatment in hospitalized patients with acute psychotic agitation (related to DSM-III-R diagnoses).
Patients received up to 3 days of flexible-dose ziprasidone i.m. (N = 90) or haloperidol i.m. (N = 42) followed by oral treatment to day 7. After an initial ziprasidone i.m. dose of 10 mg, subsequent i.m. doses of 5 to 20 mg could be given every 4 to 6 hours (maximum daily dose = 80 mg) if needed, followed by oral ziprasidone, 80-200 mg/day. Haloperidol i.m. doses of 2.5 to 10 mg were given on entry, followed by 2.5 to 10 mg i.m. every 4 to 6 hours (maximum daily dose = 40 mg) if needed, then by oral haloperidol, 10-80 mg/day.
The mean reductions in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total, BPRS agitation items, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale scores were statistically significantly greater (p < .05, p < .01, and p < .01, respectively) after ziprasidone i.m. treatment compared with haloperidol i.m. treatment. Further reductions in these scores also occurred in both groups following transition to oral treatment. Ziprasidone was associated with a lower incidence of movement disorders and a reduced requirement for anticholinergic medication during both i.m. and oral treatment compared with haloperidol. Movement disorder scale scores improved with ziprasidone i.m. and oral treatment, but deteriorated with haloperidol. Other adverse events were rare with both treatments.
Ziprasidone i.m. was significantly more effective in reducing the symptoms of acute psychosis and was better tolerated than haloperidol i.m., particularly in movement disorders. The transition from ziprasidone i.m. to oral ziprasidone was effective and well tolerated.
这项为期7天的随机、开放标签、多中心国际研究比较了肌肉注射齐拉西酮与肌肉注射氟哌啶醇在治疗急性精神病性激越(与DSM-III-R诊断相关)住院患者中的疗效和耐受性,以及从肌肉注射过渡到口服治疗的情况。
患者接受长达3天的灵活剂量肌肉注射齐拉西酮(N = 90)或肌肉注射氟哌啶醇(N = 42),随后口服治疗至第7天。初始肌肉注射齐拉西酮剂量为10 mg后,如有需要,随后可每4至6小时肌肉注射5至20 mg(最大日剂量 = 80 mg),然后口服齐拉西酮,80 - 200 mg/天。入院时给予肌肉注射氟哌啶醇剂量为2.5至10 mg,如有需要,随后每4至6小时肌肉注射2.5至10 mg(最大日剂量 = 40 mg),然后口服氟哌啶醇,10 - 80 mg/天。
与肌肉注射氟哌啶醇治疗相比,肌肉注射齐拉西酮治疗后简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)总分、BPRS激越项目及临床总体印象-严重程度量表评分的平均降低幅度在统计学上显著更大(分别为p < .05、p < .01和p < .01)。两组在过渡到口服治疗后这些评分也进一步降低。与氟哌啶醇相比,齐拉西酮在肌肉注射和口服治疗期间与运动障碍发生率较低及抗胆碱能药物需求减少相关。运动障碍量表评分在肌肉注射和口服齐拉西酮治疗时有所改善,但在氟哌啶醇治疗时恶化。两种治疗的其他不良事件均罕见。
肌肉注射齐拉西酮在减轻急性精神病症状方面显著更有效,且耐受性优于肌肉注射氟哌啶醇,尤其是在运动障碍方面。从肌肉注射齐拉西酮过渡到口服齐拉西酮是有效的且耐受性良好。