Wright J G, Boddy A V, Highley M, Fenwick J, McGill A, Calvert A H
Department of Oncology, University of Newcastle, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Feb;84(4):452-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1643.
The frequent need to obtain an estimate of renal function in cancer patients, not least for targeting carboplatin dose, has led to a number of approaches to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study aimed to develop a simple and reliable method to estimate GFR using readily-available patient characteristics. Data from 62 patients with estimates of 51Cr-EDTA clearance were analysed to determine the most appropriate formula relating this method of measuring GFR to patient characteristics. The population pharmacokinetics of 51Cr-EDTA were analysed using NONMEM to evaluate the influence of each covariate. The formulae derived were then validated using a further 38 patients and compared with those obtained using existing formulae. 51Cr-EDTA clearance (GFR) was positively related to Dubois surface area, negatively related to age, and inversely related to serum creatinine (SCr). Females had lower 51Cr-EDTA clearance than males. The enzymatic method of SCr assay gave more reliable results than the Jaffe colorimetric method. A measure of creatine kinase significantly improved the estimation of GFR. The new formula produced estimates of GFR which were less biased (Mean Prediction Error = -3%) and more precise (Mean Absolute Prediction Error = 12%) than Cockcroft and Gault (-8% and 16%) or Jelliffe (-15% and 19%) estimates. The formulae developed here can be used to provide reliable estimates of GFR, particularly in regard to targeted dosing of carboplatin.
癌症患者经常需要评估肾功能,尤其是为了确定卡铂的剂量,这导致了多种估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)的方法。本研究旨在开发一种简单可靠的方法,利用易于获取的患者特征来估算GFR。分析了62例有51Cr-EDTA清除率估算值的患者的数据,以确定将这种测量GFR的方法与患者特征相关联的最合适公式。使用NONMEM分析51Cr-EDTA的群体药代动力学,以评估每个协变量的影响。然后使用另外38例患者对推导的公式进行验证,并与使用现有公式获得的结果进行比较。51Cr-EDTA清除率(GFR)与杜波依斯体表面积呈正相关,与年龄呈负相关,与血清肌酐(SCr)呈负相关。女性的51Cr-EDTA清除率低于男性。SCr测定的酶法比Jaffe比色法给出的结果更可靠。肌酸激酶的测量值显著改善了GFR的估算。新公式得出的GFR估算值比Cockcroft和Gault公式(-8%和16%)或Jelliffe公式(-15%和19%)的偏差更小(平均预测误差=-3%)且更精确(平均绝对预测误差=12%)。这里开发的公式可用于提供可靠的GFR估算值,特别是在卡铂靶向给药方面。