Moreau C E, Green B N, Johnson C D, Moreau S R
Horrigan Sports Chiropractic Soft Tissue and Athletic Injuries, Los Angeles, Calif 90067, USA.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Feb;24(2):110-22. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.112563.
To review the literature that describes and evaluates the use of isometric back extension endurance tests.
Relevant articles in English were retrieved through a search of MEDLINE and the Index to Chiropractic Literature. Key search terms were back muscle endurance, isometric back endurance, trunk extensors, back muscle performance, and Sorensen test.
The principal criterion for inclusion was as follows: any study that discussed or tested an isometric type of back endurance extension test. Studies that were excluded did not use an isometric testing protocol. Thirty-seven of the initial studies are included in this review.
Six different types of isometric back extension endurance testing methods were found. Three of these procedures require special testing devices. Much of the research on this topic has centered on a procedure known as the Sorensen test. Normative databases have been established for the Sorensen test and 2 other test types. Validity and reliability have been assessed for some of the procedures.
The influence of motivation and effort exerted by the subject are limiting factors in all of the tests reviewed. These psychologic factors warrant further research. On the basis of the literature reviewed, we determined that the Sorensen is probably the most clinically useful of these tests; it is easy to perform, requires no special equipment, and enjoys the most support from the literature.
回顾描述和评估等长背部伸展耐力测试应用的文献。
通过检索医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)和脊椎按摩文献索引获取英文相关文章。关键检索词为背部肌肉耐力、等长背部耐力、躯干伸肌、背部肌肉性能和索伦森测试。
纳入的主要标准如下:任何讨论或测试等长类型背部耐力伸展测试的研究。排除未使用等长测试方案的研究。本综述纳入了最初检索到的37项研究。
发现六种不同类型的等长背部伸展耐力测试方法。其中三种方法需要特殊测试设备。关于该主题的许多研究都集中在一种称为索伦森测试的方法上。已为索伦森测试和其他两种测试类型建立了标准数据库。已对部分测试方法的有效性和可靠性进行了评估。
在所有 reviewed 的测试中,受试者的动机和努力所产生的影响都是限制因素。这些心理因素值得进一步研究。基于所回顾的文献,我们确定索伦森测试可能是这些测试中临床实用性最高的;它操作简便,无需特殊设备,且在文献中得到的支持最多。