Suppr超能文献

公共卫生领域基于研究的信息潜力:识别未被认识到的信息需求。

The potential for research-based information in public health: identifying unrecognised information needs.

作者信息

Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2001;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-1-1. Epub 2001 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether there is a potential for greater use of research-based information in public health practice in a local setting. Secondly, if research-based information is relevant, to explore the extent to which this generates questioning behaviour.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focus group discussions, observation and interviews.

SETTING

Public health practices in Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

52 public health practitioners.

RESULTS

In general, the public health practitioners had a positive attitude towards research-based information, but believed that they had few cases requiring this type of information. They did say, however, that there might be a potential for greater use. During five focus groups and six observation days we identified 28 questions/cases where it would have been appropriate to seek out research evidence according to our definition. Three of the public health practitioners identified three of these 28 cases as questions for which research-based information could have been relevant. This gap is interpreted as representing unrecognised information needs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an unrealised potential in public health practice for more frequent and extensive use of research-based information. The practitioners did not appear to reflect on the need for scientific information when faced with new cases and few questions of this type were generated.

摘要

目的

探讨在当地环境下,公共卫生实践中是否存在更多使用基于研究的信息的潜力。其次,如果基于研究的信息是相关的,探讨其引发质疑行为的程度。

设计

采用焦点小组讨论、观察和访谈的定性研究。

背景

挪威的公共卫生实践。

参与者

52名公共卫生从业者。

结果

总体而言,公共卫生从业者对基于研究的信息持积极态度,但认为需要此类信息的案例较少。然而,他们确实表示可能有更大的使用潜力。在5次焦点小组讨论和6个观察日中,我们根据定义确定了28个问题/案例,在这些问题/案例中寻找研究证据是合适的。其中3名公共卫生从业者将这28个案例中的3个确定为基于研究的信息可能相关的问题。这种差距被解释为代表未被认识到的信息需求。

结论

公共卫生实践中更频繁、广泛地使用基于研究的信息的潜力尚未实现。从业者在面对新案例时似乎没有思考对科学信息的需求,并且很少产生这类问题。

相似文献

8
Addressing the research-practice gap in healthcare management.弥合医疗保健管理领域的研究与实践差距。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):155-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311894.57831.4b.

引用本文的文献

1
What is public health? a scoping review.什么是公共卫生?一项范围界定综述。
Arch Public Health. 2023 May 10;81(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01091-6.

本文引用的文献

5
Information resources for public health practice.公共卫生实践的信息资源。
J Urban Health. 1998 Dec;75(4):807-25. doi: 10.1007/BF02344510.
9
Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research).超越数字的论文(定性研究)。
BMJ. 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):740-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7110.740.
10
Evidence-based public health--what level of competence is required?循证公共卫生——需要何种水平的能力?
J Public Health Med. 1997 Mar;19(1):65-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024591.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验