Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A
National Institute of Public Health, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Public Health. 2001;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-1-1. Epub 2001 Jan 30.
To explore whether there is a potential for greater use of research-based information in public health practice in a local setting. Secondly, if research-based information is relevant, to explore the extent to which this generates questioning behaviour.
Qualitative study using focus group discussions, observation and interviews.
Public health practices in Norway.
52 public health practitioners.
In general, the public health practitioners had a positive attitude towards research-based information, but believed that they had few cases requiring this type of information. They did say, however, that there might be a potential for greater use. During five focus groups and six observation days we identified 28 questions/cases where it would have been appropriate to seek out research evidence according to our definition. Three of the public health practitioners identified three of these 28 cases as questions for which research-based information could have been relevant. This gap is interpreted as representing unrecognised information needs.
There is an unrealised potential in public health practice for more frequent and extensive use of research-based information. The practitioners did not appear to reflect on the need for scientific information when faced with new cases and few questions of this type were generated.
探讨在当地环境下,公共卫生实践中是否存在更多使用基于研究的信息的潜力。其次,如果基于研究的信息是相关的,探讨其引发质疑行为的程度。
采用焦点小组讨论、观察和访谈的定性研究。
挪威的公共卫生实践。
52名公共卫生从业者。
总体而言,公共卫生从业者对基于研究的信息持积极态度,但认为需要此类信息的案例较少。然而,他们确实表示可能有更大的使用潜力。在5次焦点小组讨论和6个观察日中,我们根据定义确定了28个问题/案例,在这些问题/案例中寻找研究证据是合适的。其中3名公共卫生从业者将这28个案例中的3个确定为基于研究的信息可能相关的问题。这种差距被解释为代表未被认识到的信息需求。
公共卫生实践中更频繁、广泛地使用基于研究的信息的潜力尚未实现。从业者在面对新案例时似乎没有思考对科学信息的需求,并且很少产生这类问题。