Call K T, Dowd B E, Feldman R, Lurie N, McBean M A, Maciejewski M
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Box 729 Mayo, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Jan;7(1):37-51.
Since the program's inception, there has been great interest in determining whether beneficiaries who enter and subsequently leave Medicare health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are more or less costly than those remaining in fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.
To examine whether relatively high-cost beneficiaries disenroll from Medicare HMOs (disenrollment bias) and whether disenrollment bias varies by Medicare HMO market characteristics. In addition, we compare rates of surgical procedures and hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions for disenrollees and continuing FFS beneficiaries.
Cross-sectional analysis of 1994 Medicare data.
Medicare beneficiaries were first sampled from the 124 counties with at least 1000 Medicare HMO enrollees. From this pool, HMO disenrollees and a sample of continuing FFS beneficiaries were drawn. The FFS beneficiaries were assigned dates of "pseudodisenrollment." Expenditures and inpatient service use were compared for 6 months after disenrollment or pseudodisenrollment.
The HMO disenrollees were no more likely than the continuing FFS beneficiaries to have positive total expenditures (Part A plus Part B) or Part B expenditures in the first 6 months after disenrollment. However, disenrollees were more likely to have Part A expenditures. Among beneficiaries with spending, disenrollees had higher total and Part B expenditures than continuing FFS beneficiaries. Moreover, the disparity in total and Part B spending between disenrollees and continuing FFS beneficiaries increased with HMO market penetration. Although Part A spending was higher for disenrollees with spending, it was not sensitive to changes in market share. The HMO disenrollees received more surgical procedures and were hospitalized for more of the ambulatory care-sensitive conditions than the FFS beneficiaries.
On several measures, Medicare HMOs experienced favorable disenrollment relative to continuing FFS beneficiaries as recently as 1994, which increased as HMO market share increased.
自该项目启动以来,人们一直非常关注确定那些加入并随后退出医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)的受益人与那些仍留在按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险体系中的受益人相比,成本是更高还是更低。
研究相对高成本的受益人是否会退出医疗保险HMO(退出偏差),以及退出偏差是否因医疗保险HMO市场特征而异。此外,我们比较了退出者和继续留在FFS体系中的受益人的手术率和非卧床护理敏感疾病的住院率。
对1994年医疗保险数据进行横断面分析。
首先从至少有1000名医疗保险HMO参保人的124个县中抽取医疗保险受益人。从这个群体中,抽取了HMO退出者和继续留在FFS体系中的受益人的样本。为FFS受益人指定了“假退出”日期。比较了退出或假退出后6个月内的支出和住院服务使用情况。
在退出后的前6个月,HMO退出者的总支出(A部分加B部分)或B部分支出为正的可能性并不比继续留在FFS体系中的受益人更高。然而,退出者更有可能产生A部分支出。在有支出记录的受益人中,退出者的总支出和B部分支出高于继续留在FFS体系中的受益人。此外,退出者和继续留在FFS体系中的受益人在总支出和B部分支出上的差距随着HMO市场渗透率的提高而增大。虽然有支出记录的退出者的A部分支出较高,但它对市场份额的变化不敏感。与FFS受益人相比,HMO退出者接受了更多的手术,并且因更多的非卧床护理敏感疾病而住院。
在几项指标上,直到1994年,与继续留在FFS体系中的受益人相比,医疗保险HMO的退出情况较为有利,并且随着HMO市场份额的增加而更加明显。