• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险按服务付费和管理式医疗模式下中风患者的治疗结果。

Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care.

作者信息

Retchin S M, Brown R S, Yeh S C, Chu D, Moreno L

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1997 Jul 9;278(2):119-24.

PMID:9214526
Abstract

CONTEXT

Increasing numbers of Medicare beneficiaries have been enrolling in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) because HMO participation reduces out-of-pocket expenses, and the federal government views HMOs as a way to contain Medicare costs. However, results comparing outcomes and quality of care in HMOs vs fee for service (FFS) have been mixed, and outcomes after stroke have not been adequately assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare discharge destinations and survival rates following stroke in Medicare HMOs with similar FFS settings.

DESIGN

An observational study for 2 groups evaluating stroke patients' discharge destinations and survival times from the date of hospital admission.

SETTING

A total of 19 HMOs were selected from 12 states. The FFS sample was drawn from the same geographic areas.

PATIENTS

The sample included 402 HMO patients from 71 hospitals and 408 FFS patients from 60 hospitals. PROCESS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were abstracted from medical records on demographics, clinical characteristics of stroke, comorbid illnesses, and discharge destinations following hospitalization. Data on survival were obtained from Medicare files and included 25 to 37 months of follow-up (median, 30.4 months, HMO; 31.1 months, FFS) from the date of hospital admission.

RESULTS

There were 109 patients who died during the hospitalization (49 HMO, 12.2%; 60 FFS, 14.7%), and a total of 410 patients had died by the end of follow-up (191 HMO, 47.5%; 219 FFS, 53.7%). Approximately one fourth of both groups had do-not-resuscitate orders (HMO, 25.4%; FFS, 27.9%; P=.68). After controlling for age, marital status, and characteristics of dependency at discharge, HMO patients were more likely than FFS patients to be sent to nursing homes (HMO, 41.8%; FFS, 27.9%; P=.001) and less likely to be discharged to rehabilitation hospitals or units (HMO, 16.2%; FFS, 23.4%; P=.03). At follow-up, no significant differences in relative risk of dying were found between HMO and FFS groups (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.26; P=.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in Medicare HMOs who experience strokes are more likely to be discharged to nursing homes and less likely to go to rehabilitation facilities following the acute event. However, they have similar survival patterns compared with comparable patients in FFS settings after adjusting for other factors.

摘要

背景

越来越多的医疗保险受益人加入了健康维护组织(HMO),因为加入HMO可降低自付费用,而且联邦政府将HMO视为控制医疗保险成本的一种方式。然而,比较HMO与按服务收费(FFS)的医疗结果和护理质量的研究结果不一,且中风后的结果尚未得到充分评估。

目的

比较医疗保险HMO与类似FFS环境中中风后的出院去向和生存率。

设计

一项针对两组的观察性研究,评估中风患者从入院日期起的出院去向和生存时间。

地点

从12个州中选取了19个HMO。FFS样本来自相同的地理区域。

患者

样本包括来自71家医院的402名HMO患者和来自60家医院的408名FFS患者。过程和结果测量:从病历中提取有关人口统计学、中风的临床特征、合并疾病以及住院后的出院去向的数据。生存数据来自医疗保险档案,包括从入院日期起25至37个月的随访(中位数,HMO为30.4个月;FFS为31.1个月)。

结果

109名患者在住院期间死亡(49名HMO患者,12.2%;60名FFS患者,14.7%),到随访结束时共有410名患者死亡(191名HMO患者,47.5%;219名FFS患者,53.7%)。两组中约四分之一的患者有不要复苏的医嘱(HMO为25.4%;FFS为27.9%;P = 0.68)。在控制了年龄、婚姻状况和出院时的依赖特征后,HMO患者比FFS患者更有可能被送往养老院(HMO为41.8%;FFS为27.9%;P = 0.001),而被送往康复医院或康复科的可能性较小(HMO为16.2%;FFS为23.4%;P = 0.03)。在随访中,HMO组和FFS组之间在死亡相对风险上没有发现显著差异(相对风险为0.96;95%置信区间为0.73 - 1.26;P = 0.7)。

结论

患有中风的医疗保险HMO患者在急性事件后更有可能被送往养老院,而前往康复机构的可能性较小。然而,在调整其他因素后,与FFS环境中的类似患者相比,他们的生存模式相似。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care.医疗保险按服务付费和管理式医疗模式下中风患者的治疗结果。
JAMA. 1997 Jul 9;278(2):119-24.
2
Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional Medicare plans.在管理式医疗和传统医疗保险计划中,中风患者的再次住院情况和生存率。
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):902-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173597.97232.a0.
3
Variations in patterns of care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction for Medicare beneficiaries in fee-for-service and HMO settings.按服务收费和健康维护组织(HMO)模式下医疗保险受益人的急性心肌梗死后护理模式和结果的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Aug;38(4):1065-79. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00163.
4
Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare.医疗保险计划中的初级保健质量:比较医疗保险健康维护组织与传统按服务收费医疗保险的表现。
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):757-65. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.7.757.
5
Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.健康维护组织(HMO)和按服务收费系统中治疗的老年贫困慢性病患者4年健康结局的差异。医疗结局研究的结果。
JAMA. 1996 Oct 2;276(13):1039-47.
6
Disenrollment from Medicare HMOs.退出医疗保险健康维护组织
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Jan;7(1):37-51.
7
Case mix of home health patients under capitated and fee-for-service payment.按人头付费和按服务收费方式下家庭健康患者的病例组合
Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1):79-113.
8
Prostate cancer treatment and ten-year survival among group/staff HMO and fee-for-service Medicare patients.健康维护组织(HMO)团体/员工以及按服务收费的医疗保险患者的前列腺癌治疗与十年生存率
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):525-46.
9
The effect of HMOs on the inpatient utilization of medicare beneficiaries.人乳寡糖对医疗保险受益人的住院使用率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1607-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00306.x.
10
Timeliness and quality of care for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction under health maintenance organization vs fee-for-service insurance.健康维护组织(HMO)与按服务收费保险模式下老年急性心肌梗死患者护理的及时性和质量
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Sep 27;159(17):2013-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.17.2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Population turnover and leakage in commercial ACOs.商业 ACO 中的人员流动和流失。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Apr 1;29(4):e104-e110. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89350.
2
Immediate effects of upper thoracic spine manipulation on hypertensive individuals.上胸椎整复对高血压患者的即时影响。
J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Feb;23(1):43-50. doi: 10.1179/1066981714Z.000000000106.
3
Effect of insurance status on postacute care among working age stroke survivors.保险状况对工作年龄脑卒中幸存者的康复护理的影响。
Neurology. 2012 May 15;78(20):1590-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182563bf5. Epub 2012 May 2.
4
Use of antithrombotic medications among elderly ischemic stroke patients.老年缺血性中风患者抗血栓药物的使用情况。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Jan 1;4(1):30-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.850883. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
5
An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: the association between health insurance status and access, care delivery, and outcomes for patients who are critically ill.美国胸科学会官方系统评价:健康保险状况与危重症患者的获得途径、护理提供和结局的关系。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 1;181(9):1003-11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200902-0281ST.
6
Physician remuneration methods for family physicians in Canada: expected outcomes and lessons learned.加拿大家庭医生的薪酬方法:预期结果和经验教训。
Health Care Anal. 2010 Mar;18(1):35-59. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0105-9. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
7
Cost-effectiveness of providing full drug coverage to increase medication adherence in post-myocardial infarction Medicare beneficiaries.为提高心肌梗死后医疗保险受益人的药物依从性而提供全面药物覆盖的成本效益。
Circulation. 2008 Mar 11;117(10):1261-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735605. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
8
Competition in a publicly funded healthcare system.公共资助医疗体系中的竞争。
BMJ. 2007 Dec 1;335(7630):1126-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39400.549502.94.
9
Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional Medicare plans.在管理式医疗和传统医疗保险计划中,中风患者的再次住院情况和生存率。
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):902-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173597.97232.a0.
10
In-hospital care pathways for stroke.中风的院内护理路径
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD002924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002924.pub2.