Morris R C
Health Sciences Center Library, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131-5686, USA.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Jan;89(1):29-36.
To explore whether the presence of online tables of contents (TOC) in an online catalog affects circulation (checkouts and inhouse usage). Two major questions were posed: (1) did the presence of online tables of contents for books increase use, and, (2) if it did, what factors might cause the increase?
A randomized and stratified design was used in tracking usage of 3,957 book titles that were previously divided into two groups: one with TOC and one without TOC. Stratification was done for year of imprint, location, subject, previous use, circulating or non-circulating status, and presence of TOC. The use was tracked by the online catalog statistics in the InnoPac online catalog for fourteen months.
The study found that tables of contents do increase usage. It also showed a correlation in the size of the effect based on the currency of the titles. In general, even after adjusting for all of the variables (publication date, location, circulation status, subject, and previous use), the odds of a title being used increased by 45% if the titles had online tables of contents, a statistically significant impact at the 0.05 level.
This case-control study presents new information about the impact on circulation and inhouse use when tables of contents for books are added to the online catalog record. The study helps to establish the positive role of tables of contents in online catalogs. The research establishes TOC as a major parameter that can be successfully studied using quantitative methods. The study also provides information professionals with some guidance on when enhancement of TOC is likely to be most effective in increasing the use of existing collections.
探讨在线目录中图书在线目录(TOC)的存在是否会影响流通量(借阅量和馆内使用量)。提出了两个主要问题:(1)图书在线目录的存在是否会增加其使用量,以及(2)如果增加了,哪些因素可能导致这种增加?
采用随机分层设计,跟踪3957种图书的使用情况,这些图书先前被分为两组:一组有TOC,一组没有TOC。按出版年份、位置、主题、先前使用情况、流通或非流通状态以及TOC的存在进行分层。通过InnoPac在线目录中的在线目录统计数据跟踪了14个月的使用情况。
研究发现目录确实会增加使用量。研究还表明,根据图书的时效性,影响大小存在相关性。一般来说,即使对所有变量(出版日期、位置、流通状态、主题和先前使用情况)进行调整后,如果图书有在线目录,其被使用的几率会增加45%,在0.05水平上具有统计学意义。
这项病例对照研究提供了有关在在线目录记录中添加图书目录对流通量和馆内使用量影响的新信息。该研究有助于确立目录在在线目录中的积极作用。该研究将TOC确立为一个可以使用定量方法成功研究的主要参数。该研究还为信息专业人员提供了一些指导,说明何时增强TOC可能最有效地增加对现有馆藏的使用。