Lynch F H, Lasater M C
Medical Center Library, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-2340.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Jan;78(1):23-8.
Prior to planning for implementing the NOTIS system, the Vanderbilt Medical Center Library had not fully cataloged its government publications, and records for these materials were not in machine-readable format. A decision was made that patrons should need to look in only one place for all library materials, including the Health and Human Services Department publications received each year from the central library's Government Documents Unit. Beginning in 1985, these publications were added to the library's database, and the entire 7,200-piece collection is now in the online catalog. Working with these publications has taught the library much about the advantages and disadvantages of cataloging government documents in an online environment. It was found that OCLC cataloging copy is eventually available for most titles, although only about 10% of the records have MeSH headings. Staff time is the major expenditure; problems are caused by documents' irregular nature, frequent format changes, and difficult authority work. Since their addition to the online catalog, documents are used more and the library has better control.
在规划实施NOTIS系统之前,范德比尔特医疗中心图书馆尚未对其政府出版物进行全面编目,这些资料的记录也不是机器可读格式。图书馆做出了一项决定,读者只需在一个地方查找所有图书馆资料,包括每年从中央图书馆政府文献部收到的卫生与公众服务部出版物。从1985年开始,这些出版物被添加到图书馆数据库中,现在整个7200册的馆藏都已录入在线目录。处理这些出版物让图书馆对在在线环境中编目政府文件的优缺点有了很多了解。结果发现,虽然只有约10%的记录有医学主题词表(MeSH)标题,但大多数图书最终都能获得联机计算机图书馆中心(OCLC)的编目副本。员工时间是主要支出;文件性质不规律、格式频繁变化以及权威工作困难导致了一些问题。自这些文件被添加到在线目录以来,其使用频率更高,图书馆也有了更好的管控。