Atlas M C
Kornhauser Health Sciences Library, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Jan;89(1):51-8.
Conflicts can occur between the principle of freedom of information treasured by librarians and ethical standards of scientific research involving the propriety of using data derived from immoral or dishonorable experimentation. A prime example of this conflict was brought to the attention of the medical and library communities in 1995 when articles claiming that the subjects of the illustrations in the classic anatomy atlas, Eduard Pernkopf's Topographische Anatomie des Menschen, were victims of the Nazi holocaust. While few have disputed the accuracy, artistic, or educational value of the Pernkopf atlas, some have argued that the use of such subjects violates standards of medical ethics involving inhuman and degrading treatment of subjects or disrespect of a human corpse. Efforts were made to remove the book from medical libraries. In this article, the history of the Pernkopf atlas and the controversy surrounding it are reviewed. The results of a survey of academic medical libraries concerning their treatment of the Pernkopf atlas are reported, and the ethical implications of these issues as they affect the responsibilities of librarians is discussed.
图书馆员珍视的信息自由原则与科学研究的道德标准之间可能会产生冲突,后者涉及使用源自不道德或可耻实验的数据是否恰当。1995年,这一冲突的一个典型例子引起了医学和图书馆界的关注,当时有文章称,经典解剖学图谱《爱德华·佩恩科夫人体解剖学图谱》(Eduard Pernkopf's Topographische Anatomie des Menschen)中的插图对象是纳粹大屠杀的受害者。虽然很少有人质疑佩恩科夫图谱的准确性、艺术性或教育价值,但一些人认为,使用此类对象违反了医学伦理标准,涉及对受试者的不人道和有辱人格的对待,或对人类尸体的不尊重。有人试图将这本书从医学图书馆中移除。在本文中,回顾了佩恩科夫图谱的历史及其引发的争议。报告了对学术医学图书馆关于其对佩恩科夫图谱处理方式的调查结果,并讨论了这些问题在影响图书馆员职责方面的伦理含义。