• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种数字射线照相存储磷光体系统的比较研究

Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.

作者信息

Oliveira A E, de Almeida S M, Paganini G A, Haiter Neto F, Bóscolo F N

机构信息

Departamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2000;11(2):111-6.

PMID:11210259
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the image quality and dynamic range of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems: Digora (Soredex, Finland) and DenOptix (Gendex, USA). Four objects were analyzed and eight exposure times employed, totaling 64 images that were analyzed by 5 examiners using a scale from 1 to 4 to classify the images. The scores were submitted to analysis of variance and the results showed statistical differences among the averages attributed to the systems, to the exposition times and to the objects (p 0.01 Pound). Digora presented a larger dynamic range and, in general, a better image quality. Although these 2 systems present the same photon detector, they present different results in relation to the evaluated items.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估两种数字射线存储磷光体系统的图像质量和动态范围

Digora(芬兰Soredex公司)和DenOptix(美国Gendex公司)。分析了四个物体,并采用了八个曝光时间,共64张图像,由5名检查人员使用1至4的评分标准对图像进行分类。对评分进行方差分析,结果显示,归因于系统、曝光时间和物体的平均值之间存在统计学差异(p<0.01)。Digora具有更大的动态范围,总体而言图像质量更好。尽管这两种系统使用相同的光子探测器,但在评估项目方面呈现出不同的结果。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.两种数字射线照相存储磷光体系统的比较研究
Braz Dent J. 2000;11(2):111-6.
2
Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.用于数字化口腔内放射摄影的固态和光激励磷光体系统的主观图像质量
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Mar;29(2):70-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600501.
3
Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.使用主观图像质量对三种口腔内存储磷光体系统进行比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Sep;29(5):272-6. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600532.
4
An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.四种数字化口腔内放射成像系统的客观比较:感光特性与分辨率
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Mar;29(2):76-80. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600504.
5
Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions.对使用不同磷光存储板(PSP)获取的数字图像进行分析,这些磷光存储板经受不同的读取时间和存储条件。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003 May;32(3):186-90. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/24355220.
6
The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?数字放射成像系统的动态范围:剂量降低还是过度曝光风险?
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jan;33(1):1-5. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/40677472.
7
Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.邻面龋的影像学检测:牙科胶片与数字成像系统的比较
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Sep;29(5):312-8. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600553.
8
Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors.挪威普通牙科医生使用固态探测器和存储磷光探测器的经验。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 Jul;30(4):203-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600613.
9
A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.胶片与数字传感器对模拟根尖周病变检测诊断效能的比较评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Jul;92(1):93-7. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115974.
10
Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.应用各种图像处理算法前后数字射线照片的可感知性曲线测试。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Dec;36(8):490-4. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20897311.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of Approximal Caries after Delayed Scanning of Photostimulable Phosphor Plates.光激励荧光板延迟扫描后邻面龋的诊断
J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Sep;18(3):201-206.
2
Radiopacity of restorative composites by conventional radiograph and digital images with different resolutions.通过传统X线片和不同分辨率数字图像评估修复性复合材料的射线不透性。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2013 Sep;43(3):145-51. doi: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.3.145. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
3
Comparison of the delay in processing time and protective plastic cases in two phosphor plate systems.
两种磷光板系统中处理时间延迟与保护塑料盒的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:850764. doi: 10.1100/2012/850764. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
4
Effect of alternative photostimulable phosphor plates erasing times on subjective digital image quality.不同激发磷光板擦除次数对主观数字图像质量的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jan;39(1):23-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/49065239.
5
Evaluation of the effects of processing delays and protective plastic cases on image quality of a photostimulable phosphor plate system.光激励荧光板系统中处理延迟和保护塑料盒对图像质量影响的评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Sep-Oct;16(5):350-4. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000500009.