Expert testimony by persons trained in ethical reasoning: the case of Andrew Sawatzky.
作者信息
Baylis F
机构信息
Department of Bioethics and Philosophy at Dalhousie University, Halifax.
出版信息
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):224-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00663.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Expert testimony by persons trained in ethical reasoning: the case of Andrew Sawatzky.接受过伦理推理训练的人员提供的专家证词：安德鲁·萨瓦茨基案
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):224-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00663.x.
2
Assigning an appropriate surrogate.指定一个合适的替代物。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Oct-Nov;24(5):422-8. doi: 10.1177/1049909107307373.
3
Commentary: weighing and comparing expert testimony by medical ethicists.
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):236-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00665.x.
4
Commentary: the wizard of oughts.评论：“应该”的向导。
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):232-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00664.x.
5
Rebuttal: expert ethics testimony.反驳：专家伦理证词。
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):240-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00666.x.
6
7
Bioethics in a legal forum: confessions of an "expert" witness.法律论坛中的生物伦理学：一位“专家”证人的自白。
J Med Philos. 1997 Aug;22(4):297-324. doi: 10.1093/jmp/22.4.297.
8
In re Finn.关于芬恩案
Issues Law Med. 1996 Spring;11(4):437-40.
9
Response: Narcissus meets Pandora.回应：水仙遇见潘多拉。
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):243-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00667.x.
10
[CME. Patient advance directives in family medicine].[继续医学教育。家庭医学中的患者预先医疗指示]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2015 Sep 30;104(20):1059-65; quiz 1066-7. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002168.
引用本文的文献
1
Is the Canadian health care system ready for donation after cardiac death? A note of caution.加拿大医疗保健系统是否为心源性死亡后的捐赠做好准备？需谨慎对待。
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):905. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061155.
2
Ethics roundtable debate: patients and surrogates want 'everything done'--what does 'everything' mean?伦理圆桌辩论：患者及其代理人希望“竭尽全力”——“一切”意味着什么？
Crit Care. 2006;10(5):231. doi: 10.1186/cc5016.
Zotero 插件