Suppr超能文献

关于芬恩案

In re Finn.

出版信息

Issues Law Med. 1996 Spring;11(4):437-40.

PMID:8934862
Abstract

HELD

State statute governing resuscitative decisions requires that (1) all persons be presumed to have capacity to make their own treatment decisions, and thus incapacity must be established by written determination of attending physician; failure to do so was sufficient basis to rescind DNR order requested by surrogate; (2) surrogate decision to request DNR order must be supported by the patient's current medical condition and fulfill statutory criteria; physicians' opinions regarding hypothetical future conditions and failure to support "medical futility" of treatment for patient did not support surrogate decision; and (3) statutory provision allowing surrogate to authorize DNR order on basis that resuscitative measures would pose an "extraordinary burden" for patient is unconstitutionally vague.

摘要

裁决

关于复苏决策的州法规要求:(1)所有人均应被推定为有能力做出自己的治疗决策,因此无行为能力必须由主治医生的书面判定来确定;未能如此做是撤销替代人所请求的“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的充分依据;(2)替代人请求“不要复苏”医嘱的决定必须有患者当前的病情作为支撑,并符合法定标准;医生关于假设的未来状况的意见以及未能支持对患者治疗的“医疗无效性”,均不能支持替代人的决定;以及(3)法规中允许替代人基于复苏措施将给患者带来“超常负担”而授权“不要复苏”医嘱的条款在宪法上含糊不清。

相似文献

1
In re Finn.关于芬恩案
Issues Law Med. 1996 Spring;11(4):437-40.
2
In re Finn.关于芬恩案
Wests N Y Suppl. 1995 Feb 21;625:809-14.
8
State plans for surrogate decision making.国家关于替代决策的计划。
JAMA. 1994 Sep 21;272(11):849-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520110027015.
10
When should patients not be resuscitated?患者何时不应进行心肺复苏?
Med Leg J. 1997;65(Pt. 1):34-6. doi: 10.1177/002581729706500104.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验