• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能够检测低水平麻风分枝杆菌DNA的聚合酶链反应引物。

PCR primers that can detect low levels of Mycobacterium leprae DNA.

作者信息

Donoghue H D, Holton J, Spigelman M

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, University College London, London W1T 4JF.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2001 Feb;50(2):177-182. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-2-177.

DOI:10.1099/0022-1317-50-2-177
PMID:11211226
Abstract

There are several specific PCR-based methods to detect Mycobacterium leprae DNA, but the amplicons are quite large. For example, primers that target the 36-kDa antigen gene and are in common diagnostic use yield a 530-bp product. This may be a disadvantage when examining samples in which the DNA is likely to be damaged and fragmented. Therefore, two sets of M. leprae-specific nested primers were designed, based on existing primer pairs which have been shown to be specific for M. leprae. Primers that targeted the 18-kDa antigen gene gave an outer product of 136 bp and inner product of 110 bp. The primers based on the RLEP repetitive sequence yielded a 129-bp outer product and 99-bp nested product. With dilutions of a standard M. leprae killed whole-cell preparation as the source of DNA, both single-stage and nested PCR were performed after optimisation of the experimental conditions. Compared with the 36-kDa antigen gene primers, the 18-kDa antigen gene outer primers were 100-fold more sensitive and the RLEP outer primers were 1000-fold more sensitive. As an illustration of two possible applications of these new primers, positive results were obtained from three skin slit samples from treated lepromatous leprosy patients and three archaeological samples from human remains showing typical leprosy palaeopathology. It was concluded that these new primers are a useful means of detecting M. leprae DNA which is damaged or present at a very low level.

摘要

有几种基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的特定方法可用于检测麻风分枝杆菌DNA,但扩增产物相当大。例如,常用于诊断的靶向36 kDa抗原基因的引物会产生一个530 bp的产物。在检测DNA可能已受损和片段化的样本时,这可能是一个缺点。因此,基于已被证明对麻风分枝杆菌具有特异性的现有引物对,设计了两组麻风分枝杆菌特异性巢式引物。靶向18 kDa抗原基因的引物产生136 bp的外侧产物和110 bp的内侧产物。基于RLEP重复序列的引物产生129 bp的外侧产物和99 bp的巢式产物。以标准麻风分枝杆菌灭活全细胞制剂的稀释液作为DNA来源,在优化实验条件后进行单阶段PCR和巢式PCR。与36 kDa抗原基因引物相比,18 kDa抗原基因外侧引物的灵敏度高100倍,RLEP外侧引物的灵敏度高1000倍。作为这些新引物两种可能应用的示例,从3例经治疗的瘤型麻风患者的皮肤切口样本和3例显示典型麻风古病理学的人类遗骸考古样本中获得了阳性结果。得出的结论是,这些新引物是检测受损或含量极低的麻风分枝杆菌DNA的有用手段。

相似文献

1
PCR primers that can detect low levels of Mycobacterium leprae DNA.能够检测低水平麻风分枝杆菌DNA的聚合酶链反应引物。
J Med Microbiol. 2001 Feb;50(2):177-182. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-2-177.
2
Comparison of two different PCR amplification products (the 18-kDa protein gene vs. RLEP repetitive sequence) in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium leprae.两种不同PCR扩增产物(18-kDa蛋白基因与RLEP重复序列)在麻风分枝杆菌诊断中的比较。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003 Jul;28(4):420-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2003.01300.x.
3
Mycobacterium leprae specific genomic target in the promoter region of probable 4-alpha-glucanotransferase (ML1545) gene with potential sensitivity for polymerase chain reaction based diagnosis of leprosy.可能的4-α-葡聚糖转移酶(ML1545)基因启动子区域中麻风分枝杆菌特异性基因组靶点,对基于聚合酶链反应的麻风诊断具有潜在敏感性。
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Jun;5(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
A colorimetric PCR method for the detection of M. leprae in skin biopsies from leprosy patients.一种用于检测麻风病患者皮肤活检中麻风杆菌的比色聚合酶链反应方法。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1994 Dec;62(4):512-20.
5
Develop and Field Evolution of Single Tube Nested PCR, SYBRGreen PCR Methods, for the Diagnosis of Leprosy in Paraffin-embedded Formalin Fixed Tissues in Yunnan Province, a Hyper endemic Area of Leprosy in China.建立并现场应用单管巢式 PCR 和 SYBRGreen PCR 方法检测云南省石蜡包埋福尔马林固定组织中麻风分枝杆菌
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 2;13(10):e0007731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007731. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Detection of leprosy in ancient human skeletal remains by molecular identification of Mycobacterium leprae.通过对麻风分枝杆菌进行分子鉴定来检测古代人类骨骼遗骸中的麻风病。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 Sep;114(3):428-36. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/114.3.428.
7
Novel PCR primers for improved detection of Mycobacterium leprae and diagnosis of leprosy.新型 PCR 引物可提高麻风分枝杆菌检测和麻风病诊断的效果。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Jun;128(6):1814-1819. doi: 10.1111/jam.14592. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
Comparative evaluation of PCR amplification of RLEP, 16S rRNA, rpoT and Sod A gene targets for detection of M. leprae DNA from clinical and environmental samples.用于从临床和环境样本中检测麻风分枝杆菌DNA的RLEP、16S rRNA、rpoT和Sod A基因靶点的PCR扩增的比较评估。
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2015 Mar;4(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2014.11.062. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
Evaluation of real-time and conventional PCR targeting complex 85 genes for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin biopsy samples from patients diagnosed with leprosy.评估针对85个复合基因的实时荧光定量PCR和传统PCR用于检测麻风病患者皮肤活检样本中麻风分枝杆菌DNA的效果。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3154-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02250-05.
10
Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin lesions of leprosy patients by PCR may be affected by amplicon size.通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测麻风患者皮肤病变中的麻风分枝杆菌DNA可能会受到扩增子大小的影响。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2007 Aug;299(5-6):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00403-007-0758-5. Epub 2007 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the leprosy detection rate regarding its clinical spectrum through PCR using the gene: a scientometrics and meta-analysis.通过使用该基因的聚合酶链反应对麻风病临床谱的检测率进行比较分析:一项科学计量学与荟萃分析
Front Microbiol. 2024 Oct 21;15:1497319. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1497319. eCollection 2024.
2
Diagnostic Utility of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients of Clinically Suspected Pure Neuritic Leprosy by Identifying Mycobacterium leprae in Skin Biopsy Samples and Nasal Swabs.采用多重聚合酶链反应诊断临床上疑似单纯神经炎麻风病患者,通过皮肤活检样本和鼻拭子鉴定麻风分枝杆菌。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jul 9;111(3):554-559. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0777. Print 2024 Sep 4.
3
A comparative study on the detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using Rlep-PCR with other conventional samples.
一项关于使用Rlep-PCR检测麻风病患者尿液样本中麻风分枝杆菌DNA与其他传统样本的比较研究。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Apr 15;51(1):504. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09470-0.
4
Case Report: Borderline Lepromatous Leprosy Therapy Complicated by Type 1 Leprosy Reaction and Adverse Reactions with Dapsone and Clofazimine.病例报告:边缘界限类麻风病的治疗复杂化,出现 1 型麻风反应和氨苯砜与氯法齐明不良反应。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jan 23;110(3):483-486. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0637. Print 2024 Mar 6.
5
Effective amelioration of the Lucio phenomenon with adjuvant tofacitinib therapy in a patient with dual infection of and : a case report from India.托法替布辅助治疗对合并[具体两种感染病原体未给出]双重感染患者的卢西奥现象有效改善:来自印度的一例病例报告
Access Microbiol. 2023 Oct 20;5(10). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000460.v3. eCollection 2023.
6
Specialized active leprosy search strategies in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon identifies a hypermutated strain causing primary drug resistance.在巴西亚马逊河的麻风病流行地区采用专门的主动搜索策略,发现了一种导致原发性耐药的高度变异菌株。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 13;10:1243571. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1243571. eCollection 2023.
7
Development and validation of a multiplex real-time qPCR assay using GMP-grade reagents for leprosy diagnosis.使用 GMP 级试剂开发和验证用于麻风病诊断的多重实时 qPCR 检测方法。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Feb 18;16(2):e0009850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009850. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Standardization of SYBR Green-Based Real-Time PCR Through the Evaluation of Different Thresholds for Different Skin Layers: An Accuracy Study and Track of the Transmission Potential of Multibacillary and Paucibacillary Leprosy Patients.通过评估不同皮肤层的不同阈值对基于SYBR Green的实时PCR进行标准化:多菌型和少菌型麻风患者传播潜力的准确性研究及追踪
Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 7;12:758222. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.758222. eCollection 2021.
9
Social school contacts of multibacillary leprosy cases in children living in the hyperendemic region of the Midwest of Brazil.巴西中西部高度流行地区儿童中多菌型麻风病例的社会学校接触者。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Jul-Aug;98(4):431-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
10
Leprosy in wild chimpanzees.野生黑猩猩中的麻风病。
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7882):652-656. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03968-4. Epub 2021 Oct 13.