Fontbonne A, Berr C, Ducimetière P, Alpérovitch A
National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Unit 258, Villejuif, France.
Diabetes Care. 2001 Feb;24(2):366-70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.366.
To compare 4-year changes in cognitive performance among elderly subjects according to category of fasting blood glucose (FBG) using American Diabetes Association criteria.
Subjects without any detectable cognitive dysfunction were selected from the Epidemiology of Vascular Aging (EVA) Study, a cohort of community-dlwelling people aged 59-71 years at baseline. They were classified into glucose categories (normal, impaired fasting glucose [IFG], or diabetic) based on FBG values or known diabetes. Their cognitive abilities were assessed by a global test (Mini Mental Status Examination [MMSE]) and eight domain-specific tests, and they were reassessed 4 years later. Serious cognitive worsening was defined as a score evolution into the worst 15% of the sample's distribution of score differences (4-year score minus baseline score) for each test.
At baseline, age-, sex-, and education-adjusted scores for all cognitive tests except one were similar across glucose categories. After 4 years, diabetic subjects had a lower performance on all tests except the MMSE, with differences reaching statistical significance on four tests. Adjusted odds ratios for serious worsening over 4 years in diabetic subjects, with reference to normal subjects, were >2 for four tests (P < 0.05) and bordering this value for two others (P < 0.09). Further adjustment for blood pressure or potential cognition-affecting substances (alcohol, tobacco, and medications) did not modify these results.
Despite similar high initial cognitive function, diabetic subjects tended to have an unfavorable evolution of cognitive performance over 4 years compared with subjects who had normal glucose or IFG.
根据美国糖尿病协会的标准,比较老年受试者空腹血糖(FBG)类别之间认知能力的4年变化情况。
从血管老化流行病学(EVA)研究中选取无任何可检测到的认知功能障碍的受试者,该队列研究的基线为年龄在59 - 71岁的社区居住人群。根据FBG值或已知糖尿病情况将他们分为血糖类别(正常、空腹血糖受损[IFG]或糖尿病)。通过一项综合测试(简易精神状态检查表[MMSE])和八项特定领域测试评估他们的认知能力,并在4年后重新评估。严重认知恶化定义为每项测试中分数变化进入样本分数差异分布(4年分数减去基线分数)最差的15%。
在基线时,除一项认知测试外,所有认知测试在不同血糖类别间经年龄、性别和教育程度调整后的分数相似。4年后,糖尿病受试者在除MMSE外的所有测试中表现较低,四项测试的差异具有统计学意义。与正常受试者相比,糖尿病受试者4年中严重恶化的调整优势比在四项测试中>2(P < 0.05),另外两项测试接近该值(P < 0.09)。对血压或可能影响认知的物质(酒精、烟草和药物)进行进一步调整并未改变这些结果。
尽管初始认知功能同样较高,但与血糖正常或空腹血糖受损的受试者相比,糖尿病受试者在4年中认知能力往往有不利的变化。