Suppr超能文献

帕金森病中左旋多巴诱发异动症的加速度计评估

Accelerometric assessment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease.

作者信息

Hoff J I, van den Plas A A, Wagemans E A, van Hilten J J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 2001 Jan;16(1):58-61. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<58::aid-mds1018>3.0.co;2-9.

Abstract

Our objective was to develop parameters for objective ambulatory measurements of levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Twenty-three PD patients with mild to severe LID were submitted to a standardized protocol of 1-minute recordings during rest, talking, stress, and four activities of daily life (ADL). Patients were simultaneously monitored with portable multi-channel accelerometry (four pairs of bi-axial sensors mounted onto the most affected arm, leg, and at the trunk) and recorded by video. LID severity was assessed with a modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (m-AIMS). The signals were analyzed, and every 1/8-second interval the amplitude was obtained of the dominant frequency within 1-4 Hz and 4-8 Hz frequency bands (Amp1-4 and Amp4-8). For both measures, convergent validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness were determined. In absence of voluntary movements, a significant relation was found between Amp1-4 and Amp4-8 and m-AIMS. Repeated measurements during rest showed a high reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90 [Amp1-4] and 0.86 [Amp4-8]). The extent to which LID increased with talking and stress correlated significantly (p = 0.02) between the objective and clinical measures (intraclass correlation for differences = 0.67). During ADL, LID occurred in a similar frequency band as voluntary movements and only Amp1-4 and Amp4-8 of the trunk and leg sensor remained highly correlated with m-AIMS. Although objective measures of LID are reliable and responsive, they fail to distinguish LID from voluntary movements. These measures are of value only when obtained during rest (all sensor sites) or during ADL when derived from those body segments that are normally not involved in these ADL tasks (trunk and leg).

摘要

我们的目标是制定帕金森病(PD)患者左旋多巴诱导的异动症(LID)客观动态测量参数。23例轻度至重度LID的PD患者接受了一项标准化方案,在休息、交谈、应激以及四项日常生活活动(ADL)期间进行1分钟的记录。患者同时通过便携式多通道加速度计(四对双轴传感器安装在受影响最严重的手臂、腿部和躯干上)进行监测,并通过视频记录。LID严重程度采用改良的异常不自主运动量表(m - AIMS)进行评估。对信号进行分析,每1/8秒间隔获取1 - 4Hz和4 - 8Hz频段内主频的幅度(Amp1 - 4和Amp4 - 8)。对于这两种测量方法,确定了收敛效度、可重复性和反应性。在无自主运动时,发现Amp1 - 4和Amp4 - 8与m - AIMS之间存在显著关系。休息期间的重复测量显示出高可重复性(组内相关系数=0.90 [Amp1 - 4]和0.86 [Amp4 - 8])。客观测量与临床测量之间,LID随交谈和应激增加的程度显著相关(p = 0.02)(差异组内相关系数=0.67)。在ADL期间,LID出现在与自主运动相似的频段,只有躯干和腿部传感器的Amp1 - 4和Amp4 - 8与m - AIMS保持高度相关。尽管LID的客观测量是可靠且有反应性的,但它们无法将LID与自主运动区分开来。这些测量仅在休息期间(所有传感器部位)或ADL期间从通常不参与这些ADL任务的身体部位(躯干和腿部)获得时才有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验