Bienstein B, Grosse-Heitmeyer W
Medizinische Klinik, Kardiologie, St. Bonifatius-Hospital Lingen/Ems.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2001 Jan 26;126(4):72-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-10667.
A 65-year-old female patient had been supplied with a rate-adaptive DDD-R pacemaker system because of symptomatic sick sinus syndrome with insufficient rate increase one year ago (first implantation of a DDD-system had taken place 14 years ago). In addition she had coronary atherosclerosis without relevant haemodynamic changes. Now she was taken into hospital because of dizziness and dyspnoea on exertion, without loss of consciousness. The physical examination showed normal results concerning heart, lungs and vessels.
During pacemaker control a significant rate-dependent stimulation threshold increase was found (stimulation rate 70-160/min). Similar results were seen in threshold measurements during operation as well as for the ventricular lead implanted in 1982, and for the new electrode just placed in the right ventricle. Several pacemaker controls within 6 months after implanting the new lead showed a significant increase in pacing threshold.
Because of a new rate-dependent increase of pacing threshold the implantation of a further ventricular lead became necessary. Again a rate dependent threshold increase during and immediately after surgery was detected. This time the programming of the pacemaker allowed a good safety interval because of a generally low stimulation threshold.
This case report demonstrates a rate-dependent rise in threshold on DDD-R stimulation. It clearly shows that this rise occurred more often at high than at low rates of stimulation, but there were marked individual differences. There was no clear correlation between cycle length and the interval from implantation to the investigation. Further investigations including stimulation with various cycle lengths should be carried out in patients at high risk. Furthermore, the development of modern pacemaker systems with autocapture might help to solve this problem.
一名65岁女性患者,因症状性病态窦房结综合征且心率增加不足,于一年前植入了频率适应性DDD-R起搏器系统(14年前首次植入DDD系统)。此外,她患有冠状动脉粥样硬化,但无相关血流动力学改变。现因头晕及劳力性呼吸困难入院,无晕厥。体格检查显示心脏、肺部及血管检查结果正常。
在起搏器程控期间发现刺激阈值有明显的频率依赖性升高(刺激频率70-160次/分钟)。术中阈值测量以及1982年植入的心室导线和刚置于右心室的新电极的测量结果相似。植入新导线后6个月内的几次起搏器程控显示起搏阈值显著升高。
由于起搏阈值出现新的频率依赖性升高,有必要再次植入心室导线。再次检测到术中及术后即刻出现频率依赖性阈值升高。此次由于总体刺激阈值较低,起搏器程控允许有良好的安全间期。
本病例报告显示了DDD-R刺激时阈值的频率依赖性升高。清楚表明这种升高在高刺激频率时比在低刺激频率时更常发生,但存在明显的个体差异。周期长度与植入至检查的间期之间无明确相关性。对于高危患者应进行包括不同周期长度刺激在内的进一步研究。此外,具有自动夺获功能的现代起搏器系统的开发可能有助于解决这一问题。