• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过DDD刺激引发的心房扑动和心房颤动]

[Atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation by DDD stimulation].

作者信息

Fröhlig G, Sen S, Rettig G, Schieffer H, Bette L

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1985 Sep;74(9):537-47.

PMID:4060830
Abstract

136 patients were followed after implantation a DDD pacemaker (PM) for a total of 1,919 patient-months (m = 14.1 months/patient). 22/136 patients had one or more episodes of atrial flutter or fibrillation (AF) postoperatively. In 121/136 patients (group A) AF had not been documented before, in 4 it was unknown at the time of implantation, but was verified retrospectively (group B). 11 patients (group C) had a positive history of previous AF. Post implantation 7.4% in group A and 81.8% in group C developed AF. In patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) the incidence was 10/37 (27%), in those with AV block (AV) 6/77 (7.8%) and in cases with both SSS and AV 6/22 (27.3%). The first AF episode occurred during the implantation itself (n = 2) or during the hospital course in 9/22 patients (A: 11%, B/C: 64% early attacks), and later on in 13 with a time delay of 1-24 months (m = 8.5, 8 patients) in group A and 2-15 months (m = 6.6, 4 patients) in groups B/C. 2 patients of group C had no AF episodes post implantation. In the individual patient the number of attacks ranged from 1 to 3 (10.4/100 patient-months) in group A and from 1 to 6 (20.1/100 patient-months) in groups B/C. During AF 16/22 patients had a ventricular rate of 110-185, m = 132 bpm. In 6 patients the tachycardia was mediated by the PM and in 10 by fast intrinsic AV conduction. 1 patient with SSS, 2 with SSS + AV (spontaneous ventricular rate less than 45 bpm) and 3 with AV needed ventricular backup-pacing during AF. In 7 patients a total of 15 attacks of atrial flutter could be terminated by atrial overdrive pacing, in 5 of these episodes by temporary high rate A00 stimulation via the implanted pacemaker lead system. Otherwise AF was converted to sinus rhythm by antiarrhythmic drugs. After termination AF often recurred, but only 3 patients developed chronic atrial fibrillation. In 2 patients a ventricular rate greater than 180 bpm during AF reverted the PM to asynchronous mode, a possible cause of ventricular fibrillation in one. No other complications due to the PM itself have been encountered. AF, therefore, common during DDD pacing, even in patients without any AF history before implant. Both the incidence and the recurrence of AF depend on the presence or absence of previous atrial arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

136例患者植入双腔起搏器(PM)后随访,共计1919患者月(平均14.1月/患者)。136例患者中有22例术后发生1次或多次心房扑动或心房颤动(AF)。136例患者中121例(A组)术前无AF记录,4例植入时未知,但回顾性证实有AF(B组)。11例患者(C组)既往有AF病史。植入后A组AF发生率为7.4%,C组为81.8%。病态窦房结综合征(SSS)患者中AF发生率为10/37(27%),房室传导阻滞(AV)患者中为6/77(7.8%),SSS合并AV患者中为6/22(27.3%)。首次AF发作发生在植入过程中(n = 2)或住院期间,9/22例患者如此(A组:11%,B/C组:64%为早期发作),之后13例发作时间延迟1 - 24个月(平均8.5个月,8例),A组如此,B/C组延迟2 - 15个月(平均6.6个月,4例)。C组2例患者植入后无AF发作。A组个体患者发作次数为1至3次(10.4/100患者月),B/C组为1至6次(20.1/100患者月)。AF发作时,22/22例患者心室率为110 - 185次/分,平均132次/分;6例患者心动过速由PM介导,10例由快速固有房室传导介导。1例SSS患者、SSS + AV患者2例(自发心室率小于45次/分)及AV患者3例AF发作时需要心室备用起搏。7例患者共15次心房扑动发作可通过心房超速起搏终止,其中5次发作通过植入起搏器导线系统进行临时高频率A00刺激终止。否则AF通过抗心律失常药物转为窦性心律。AF终止后常复发,但仅3例患者发展为慢性心房颤动。2例患者AF发作时心室率大于180次/分导致PM转为非同步模式,可能导致其中1例患者发生心室颤动。未遇到因PM本身导致的其他并发症。因此,即使术前无AF病史,DDD起搏期间AF也很常见。AF的发生率和复发均取决于既往是否存在房性心律失常。(摘要截短至400字)

相似文献

1
[Atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation by DDD stimulation].[通过DDD刺激引发的心房扑动和心房颤动]
Z Kardiol. 1985 Sep;74(9):537-47.
2
[Usefulness of atrial vulnerability in predicting atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with DDD pacemaker].[心房易损性在预测接受DDD起搏器治疗的病态窦房结综合征患者房颤发生中的应用价值]
G Ital Cardiol. 1999 Jan;29(1):59-62.
3
[Modulation of atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Immediate and long-term results].[心房颤动或心房扑动患者房室传导的调制。即时和长期结果]
Cardiologia. 1995 Dec;40(12):927-40.
4
AAIsafeR limits ventricular pacing in unselected patients.AAIsafeR限制未筛选患者的心室起搏。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S66-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00608.x.
5
Sinus and paced P wave duration and dispersion as predictors of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome.窦房结与起搏P波时限及离散度作为单纯病态窦房结综合征患者起搏器植入术后房颤预测指标的研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 May;27(5):606-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00494.x.
6
[Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].[病窦综合征的起搏器治疗。心房参与的起搏器系统是否能降低心房颤动、血栓栓塞并发症的发生率以及死亡率?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994 Dec 9;119(49):1683-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058887.
7
Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients.单腔心房起搏:窦房结疾病的一种现实选择:对213例患者的长期随访研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun;30(6):740-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00744.x.
8
[DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].[DDD与DDDR起搏器刺激:心肺功能、房性心律失常发生率及生活质量的比较]
Z Kardiol. 1996 Apr;85(4):226-36.
9
Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.尽管进行了心房起搏,窦房结功能障碍时心房颤动的电生理决定因素。
Europace. 2000 Oct;2(4):304-11. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0118.
10
[The effects of the ablation of atrial flutter in patients with and without a clinical history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation].[有无阵发性心房颤动临床病史患者的心房扑动消融效果]
G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Nov;28(11):1253-60.