Anzueto A, Fisher C L, Busman T, Olson C A
Division of Pulmonary Diseases/Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 78284-7885, USA.
Clin Ther. 2001 Jan;23(1):72-86. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80031-x.
Clarithromycin has established efficacy and safety in the treatment of respiratory infections.
This study examined the efficacy and safety of a new extended-release formulation of clarithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).
This phase IIIB, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, investigator-blinded study in patients with AECB and productive cough with purulent sputum compared treatment with extended-release clarithromycin (two 500-mg tablets once daily for 7 days) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (one 875-mg tablet twice daily for 10 days). Assessments were performed before treatment, between study days 10 and 12 (or within 48 hours after premature discontinuation), and between study days 17 and 21 (test of cure).
Of 287 patients randomized and treated, 270 were clinically evaluable (137 clarithromycin, 133 amoxicillin/clavulanate). Treatment groups were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics, medical condition, and history. Among clinically evaluable patients at test of cure, 85% and 87% of clarithromycin- and amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients, respectively, demonstrated clinical cure (as defined in 1998 draft US Food and Drug Administration guidelines); among clinically and bacteriologically evaluable patients, 92% versus 89%, respectively, demonstrated bacteriologic cure. Overall pathogen eradication rates were similar in the 2 groups (88% clarithromycin, 89% amoxicillin/clavulanate). Rates of premature discontinuation of study drug for any reason differed between treatments: 3% (4/142) of clarithromycin-treated patients versus 12% (17/145) of amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients (P = 0.005). One percent (2/142) and 6% (8/145) of the respective treatment groups discontinued study drug because of adverse events. Adverse events generally occurred with a similar frequency in the 2 groups; however, taste alteration was more common with clarithromycin (9/142 [6%]) than with amoxicillin/clavulanate (1/145 [1%]; P = 0.01). Mean severity scores for gastrointestinal adverse events showed a significant difference between groups (1.16 for clarithromycin-treated patients and 1.58 for amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients: P = 0.016).
The results of this study demonstrate the clinical and bacteriologic equivalence and improved gastrointestinal tolerability of a 7-day course of once-daily extended-release clarithromycin relative to a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of AECB.
克拉霉素在治疗呼吸道感染方面已证实其有效性和安全性。
本研究比较了一种新的克拉霉素缓释制剂与阿莫西林/克拉维酸在治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重(AECB)方面的有效性和安全性。
这项III B期、多中心、随机、平行组、研究者设盲的研究纳入了患有AECB且有脓性痰的咳痰患者,比较了缓释克拉霉素(每日一次,两片500毫克片剂,共7天)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸(每日两次,一片875毫克片剂,共10天)的治疗效果。在治疗前、研究第10天至第12天之间(或提前停药后48小时内)以及研究第17天至第21天之间进行评估(治愈试验)。
在287例随机分组并接受治疗的患者中,270例可进行临床评估(137例接受克拉霉素治疗,133例接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗)。治疗组在人口统计学特征、病情和病史方面匹配良好。在治愈试验中可进行临床评估的患者中,接受克拉霉素和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者分别有85%和87%显示临床治愈(按照美国食品药品监督管理局1998年草案指南定义);在可进行临床和细菌学评估的患者中,分别有92%和89%显示细菌学治愈。两组的总体病原体根除率相似(克拉霉素为88%,阿莫西林/克拉维酸为89%)。因任何原因提前停用研究药物的比例在两种治疗之间存在差异:接受克拉霉素治疗的患者中有3%((4/142)),而接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中有12%((17/145))((P = 0.005))。各治疗组分别有1%((2/142))和6%((8/145))的患者因不良事件停用研究药物。不良事件在两组中的发生频率总体相似;然而,克拉霉素导致的味觉改变比阿莫西林/克拉维酸更常见(9/142 [6%] 对比1/145 [1%];(P = 0.01))。胃肠道不良事件的平均严重程度评分在两组之间存在显著差异(克拉霉素治疗的患者为1.16,阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者为1.58:(P = 0.016))。
本研究结果表明,在治疗AECB方面,与每日两次服用阿莫西林/克拉维酸共10天的疗程相比,每日一次服用克拉霉素缓释制剂共7天的疗程在临床和细菌学上等效,且胃肠道耐受性更好。