Suppr超能文献

[晶体液与温血心脏停搏液对左心室功能严重不全患者有效性的比较]

[Comparison of the effectiveness of crystalloid and warm blood cardioplegia in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction].

作者信息

Urban T, Táborský J, Vanĕk I, Semrád M, Miler I

机构信息

II. chirurgická klinika kardiovaskulární chirurgie Vseobecné fakultní nemocnice v Praze a 1. lékarské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy.

出版信息

Sb Lek. 2000;101(3):261-6.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In a group of 84 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery and with the ejection fraction lower than 40% two types of myocardial protection were studied. Group I (41 cases) was given intermittent cold crystalloid cardioplegia and group II (43 patients) was given intermittent warm blood cardioplegia followed by normothermic reperfusion. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively collected. There were no differences between the two groups except more rhythm disturbances in group I and higher incidence of neurological complications in group II.

CONCLUSIONS

Warm blood cardioplegia is an effective, cheap and practical myocardial protection technique.

摘要

未标记

在一组84例接受择期冠状动脉搭桥手术且射血分数低于40%的患者中,研究了两种心肌保护方法。第一组(41例)给予间歇性冷晶体心脏停搏液,第二组(43例)给予间歇性温血心脏停搏液并随后进行常温再灌注。回顾性收集术前、术中和术后数据。两组之间无差异,只是第一组心律失常更多,第二组神经并发症发生率更高。

结论

温血心脏停搏液是一种有效、廉价且实用的心肌保护技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验