Langrehr D, Neuhaus R, Arnold R, Singabrtl G
Anaesthesist. 1975 Feb;24(2):91-6.
A short review of the pathophysiological mechanisms in case of 'drowning' or 'near drowning' with or without aspiration of hypo- or hypertonic water is given. In our clinical experience on 22 cases, 17 did not need intensive care and improved without further problems. 3 came dead into the clinic, there being more than 30 min latency between cardiac arrest and the beginning of resuscitation, resuscitation, therefore, being without success. The last 2 cases of 'near-drowning' with fresh water aspiration developed, 100 min and 50 min respectively after the drowning accident, fulminant pulmonary oedema, which could be cured after application of PEEP in Engstroöm-IPPB in one case. In our opinion PEEP should be applied in all cases of intraalveolar pulmonary oedema in the same way as was advised for interstitial pulmonary oedema, if the individual case requires mechanical ventilation at all. The possibility of pulmonary oedema developing, even hours after the accident and primary resuscitation, should be born in mind in all cases of 'near-drowning'.
本文简要回顾了溺水或近乎溺水(伴或不伴有低渗或高渗水吸入)的病理生理机制。根据我们对22例患者的临床经验,17例患者无需重症监护,恢复良好,未出现进一步问题。3例患者入院时已死亡,心脏骤停与复苏开始之间的延迟超过30分钟,因此复苏未成功。最后2例淡水吸入性“近乎溺水”患者,分别在溺水事故发生100分钟和50分钟后出现暴发性肺水肿,其中1例在应用恩斯特龙间歇正压通气(Engstroöm-IPPB)并采用呼气末正压通气(PEEP)后治愈。我们认为,如果个别病例确实需要机械通气,对于肺泡性肺水肿的所有病例,均应按照间质肺水肿的建议方式应用PEEP。在所有“近乎溺水”病例中,都应牢记即使在事故和初步复苏数小时后仍有可能发生肺水肿。