• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型抗心律失常药物之间的临床差异。

Clinical differences between the newer antiarrhythmic agents.

作者信息

Camm A J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.

出版信息

Europace. 2000 Jul;1 Suppl C:C16-22.

PMID:11220520
Abstract

In the light of studies demonstrating the serious safety problems of antiarrhythmic agents with class I activity, research and development efforts have focused largely on drugs with a class III mechanism of action. Most of the newer agents target the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current (I(Kr)). In the case of dofetilide, the mechanism of action is relatively pure, with single I(Kr) channel blocking activity. Other agents have a wider spectrum of activity. Azimilide blocks both the rapid I(Kr) and slow I(Ks) potassium currents and ibutilide also augments the inward sodium current. Clinical investigation of these agents has shown them to be effective antiarrhythmic drugs with a number of advantages over existing agents, particularly in terms of safety. Dronedarone and tedisamil also have multichannel blocking actions and are in earlier stages of clinical development. Until now, therapeutic choices have been limited and far from ideal. It is hoped that the availability of the newer class III agents will at least provide greater choice of therapy and hopefully will bring us closer to therapeutic ideals in the management of arrhythmia.

摘要

鉴于多项研究表明具有I类活性的抗心律失常药物存在严重的安全问题,研发工作主要集中在具有III类作用机制的药物上。大多数新型药物作用于延迟整流钾电流(I(Kr))的快速成分。就多非利特而言,其作用机制相对单一,具有单一的I(Kr)通道阻断活性。其他药物的活性谱更广。阿齐利特可阻断快速I(Kr)和缓慢I(Ks)钾电流,伊布利特还可增强内向钠电流。对这些药物的临床研究表明,它们是有效的抗心律失常药物,与现有药物相比具有许多优势,尤其是在安全性方面。决奈达隆和替地沙米也具有多通道阻断作用,目前正处于临床开发的早期阶段。到目前为止,治疗选择有限且远非理想。希望新型III类药物的出现至少能提供更多的治疗选择,并有望使我们在心律失常的治疗管理上更接近治疗理想状态。

相似文献

1
Clinical differences between the newer antiarrhythmic agents.新型抗心律失常药物之间的临床差异。
Europace. 2000 Jul;1 Suppl C:C16-22.
2
Newer antiarrhythmic drugs.
Indian Heart J. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):354-60.
3
Trials of new antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004;10 Suppl 1:71-6. doi: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000011348.05608.e5.
4
New antiarrhythmic drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Feb;25(2):249-59. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00249.x.
5
Azimilide dihydrochloride: a unique class III antiarrhythmic agent.
Heart Dis. 1999 May-Jun;1(2):114-6.
6
New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy.III类抗心律失常药物治疗的新进展。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999 Jan;14(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/00001573-199901000-00004.
7
New horizons in antiarrhythmic therapy: will novel agents overcome current deficits?抗心律失常治疗的新视野:新型药物能否克服当前的不足?
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 22;102(6A):12H-19H. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.025.
8
A benefit-risk assessment of class III antiarrhythmic agents.Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物的获益-风险评估
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004 Nov;3(6):559-77. doi: 10.1517/14740338.3.6.559.
9
New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy.III类抗心律失常药物治疗的新进展。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000 Jan;15(1):41-53. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200001000-00006.
10
[Progress in the clinical use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (I)].抗心律失常药物的临床应用进展(一)
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;41(10):735-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A benefit-risk assessment of class III antiarrhythmic agents.Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物的获益-风险评估
Drug Saf. 2002;25(12):847-65. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225120-00003.