Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.

AIM

The study objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (Gd-MRA) with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of allograft renal artery stenosis (ARAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 17 renal transplant recipients (six men, 11 women, age 34-64 years) with a systolic bruit in the transplant region beyond the early post-operative period. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was performed by non-breath-hold high resolution 3D acquisition in the oblique coronal plane using a 256 x 512 matrix.Digital subtraction angiography was performed with AP and oblique views and ARAS was graded as < or =50% or >50% diameter stenosis on the view that displayed the maximal narrowing.

RESULTS

Digital subtraction angiography showed >50% stenosis in seven patients, all of whom were diagnosed correctly on Gd-MRA. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography diagnosed two patients with >50% stenosis which were not confirmed on DSA. Eight patients had no or < or =50% stenosis on both Gd-MRA and DSA. The sensitivity and specificity of Gd-MRA in revealing >50% stenosis were 100% and 75%, respectively, using DSA as the gold standard.

CONCLUSION

High resolution Gd-MRA employing a non-breath-hold technique is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of ARAS greater than 50%. It is preferred as a non-invasive screening technique to DSA in suspected ARAS.