• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[静脉注射大环内酯类抗生素所致静脉炎。红霉素与克拉霉素的对比研究]

[Phlebitis due to intravenous administration of macrolide antibiotics. A comparative study of erythromycin versus clarithromycin].

作者信息

de Dios García-Díaz J, Santolaya Perrín R, Paz Martínez Ortega M, Moreno-Vázquez M

机构信息

Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2001 Feb 3;116(4):133-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71748-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71748-4
PMID:11222159
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To know and to compare the incidence of phlebitis due to intravenous administration of macrolide antibiotics erythromycin and clarithromycin.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Non-randomized prospective study of consecutive patients who were diagnosed of community pneumonia and treated with intravenous macrolides (19 with erythromycin and 25 with clarithromycin).

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of phlebitis in patients treated with erythromycin was 78.9% (incidence rate of 0.40 episodes/patient-day) and in those treated with clarithromycin 76% (incidence rate of 0.35 episodes/patient-day).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of phlebitis is high and similar with intravenous administration of both macrolides.

摘要

背景

了解并比较静脉注射大环内酯类抗生素红霉素和克拉霉素所致静脉炎的发生率。

患者与方法

对连续诊断为社区肺炎并接受静脉大环内酯类药物治疗的患者进行非随机前瞻性研究(19例使用红霉素,25例使用克拉霉素)。

结果

接受红霉素治疗的患者静脉炎累积发生率为78.9%(发生率为0.40例/患者日),接受克拉霉素治疗的患者为76%(发生率为0.35例/患者日)。

结论

两种大环内酯类药物静脉注射时静脉炎风险均较高且相似。

相似文献

1
[Phlebitis due to intravenous administration of macrolide antibiotics. A comparative study of erythromycin versus clarithromycin].[静脉注射大环内酯类抗生素所致静脉炎。红霉素与克拉霉素的对比研究]
Med Clin (Barc). 2001 Feb 3;116(4):133-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71748-4.
2
An open, randomized, comparative study of clarithromycin and erythromycin in the treatment of children with community-acquired pneumonia.克拉霉素与红霉素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的开放性、随机、对照研究
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008 Feb;41(1):54-61.
3
The risk of hypotension following co-prescription of macrolide antibiotics and calcium-channel blockers.大环内酯类抗生素与钙通道阻滞剂联合使用后低血压的风险。
CMAJ. 2011 Feb 22;183(3):303-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100702. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
4
Comparative tolerability of erythromycin and newer macrolide antibacterials in paediatric patients.红霉素与新型大环内酯类抗菌药物在儿科患者中的耐受性比较
Drug Saf. 1999 Jan;20(1):25-41. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199920010-00004.
5
Clinical and bacteriological outcomes in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with azithromycin plus ceftriaxone, or ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin or erythromycin: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松、或头孢曲松联合克拉霉素或红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的临床和细菌学转归:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Feb;13(2):162-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01633.x.
6
Macrolides, Digoxin Toxicity and the Risk of Sudden Death: A Population-Based Study.大环内酯类药物、地高辛中毒与猝死风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Drug Saf. 2017 Sep;40(9):835-840. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0539-9.
7
A randomized comparative study on the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and erythromycin in treating community-acquired pneumonia.克拉霉素与红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的安全性和有效性的随机对照研究。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1995 Apr;55(4):302-6.
8
The effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous digoxin in healthy volunteers.红霉素和克拉霉素对健康志愿者静脉注射地高辛药代动力学的影响。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Oct;42(10):1159-64. doi: 10.1177/009127002401382641.
9
Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin versus erythromycin for the treatment of pertussis: a prospective, randomized, single blind trial.克拉霉素与红霉素治疗百日咳的疗效及安全性:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲试验
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Dec;20(12):1149-54. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200112000-00011.
10
Immediate reaction to roxithromycin and prick test cross-sensitization to erythromycin and clarithromycin.对罗红霉素的即刻反应以及对红霉素和克拉霉素的点刺试验交叉致敏。
Dermatology. 1998;196(3):335-6. doi: 10.1159/000017907.